Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Interior CMU Partition Wall 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

PittEng88

Structural
Feb 14, 2015
90
Hi All,

I am currently designing CMU partition walls (non-load bearing) that are 16' high, for an existing building in Puerto Rico. The architect has proposed a steel support frame for behind the walls to provide bracing at mid-height and the top of the walls, see attached image. The length of the long wall is 30' and the short wall length is 6'. The only loads that I anticipate for these walls are their own selfweight, a live load of 5 psf and their seismic loads (SDC = D). Due to the walls being installed in an existing building, I would like to reduce the amount of loads induced on the existing structure as much as I can. Therefore, I would like to avoid attaching the walls to the roof and to consider the connection at the bottom of the wall as pinned. I am planning on using either 8" or 10" block.

My question is, would I be able to eliminate the steel frame and be able to use just bond beams at the top of the wall and mid-height to provide enough stability for the wall? I.E. for in-plane loads, design the wall as a two story shear wall with the bond beams acting as the chords to distribute the shear force into the wall, and for out-of-plane loads, consider the bond beams as simple supports for the walls.

I hope I explained myself clear enough. However, if you have any questions or need more clarification feel free to ask. Any and all suggestions will be welcomed. I am a little green when it comes to designing w/ masonry.

Thank you for your time,
Mike
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=c79051f6-bea5-4d7a-8d1a-6f6770047b03&file=CMU_Wall.jpg
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Rolled channels with toes down will require chipping of block. Rolled channels with toes up will work but require angles.

Sorry for any confusion.
 
Jike, why the angles? I would bolt through the web into the wall.
 
Oh, I was envisioning a different detail.....I get what you are describing.....that works.
 
And I thought Hokkie was forgetting about the canted/slopped nuts after all his years spoiled with Parallel Flange Channels in Aussie!
 
I do forget lots, but haven't forgotten those bevelled washers.
 
Bevelled! Damn; I just specified them on a job and the term escaped me...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor