Paul9912
Mechanical
- Jun 20, 2012
- 2
I have recently been involved with a work related project that involves revising an existing process which has shown to be an unsuccessful “fix” for the component after it has been in service. In short, the process involves inserting a cylindrical slug into a larger body that has had a hole EDM drilled out. The slug essentially replaces the material removed during EDM and is held in place with an interference fit of approximately .0005 - .001 and also with the use of Loctite 620 retaining compound. Prior to inserting using an arbor press, the bore is checked with Go/NoGo class z pins to determine if EDM has kept their ID tolerances (+/- .001). The slug is manufactured with an OD Tolerance of +/- .0005.
The issue we see is that these slugs are coming loose while the component is in service causing the customer unexpected downtime. The conditions surrounding the component include an operating temp of 200-300 F and Hydraulic pressures / pulsations of approximately 450 bar.
Being a community of professionals, I’m sure you may already have had a “red flag” thrown and blanks drawn with my description, I do apologize. I would like to list my thoughts on how to improve the process and get your input on each; also, any suggestions of other areas I should look into that I am not touching on would be appreciated.
Please let me know if I can help clarify any info.
1. Have body bore EDM drilled slightly undersized and then finish to size using jig grinding. This will improve surface finish of bore while removing slag layer created during EDM. Jig grinding should also be a more cost effective method for maintaining a tolerance of +/- .0005 as compared to EDM.
2. Inspect bore after jig grinding with (+)(-) z class pins. If work is questionable, then inspect using same size x class pins.
3. Have slugs manufactured from material that is more comparable to the body material. The body is manufactured with 4140 alloy steel. The slugs are currently manufactured using D2. Both are tempered to a Rockwell value of 54 – 60 HRc.
4. Increase interference and freeze fit slug into body in order to reduce the chance of damage to the ID bore during inserting. The use of Loctite 620 would still be used to aid in retaining / sealing the fit.
The issue we see is that these slugs are coming loose while the component is in service causing the customer unexpected downtime. The conditions surrounding the component include an operating temp of 200-300 F and Hydraulic pressures / pulsations of approximately 450 bar.
Being a community of professionals, I’m sure you may already have had a “red flag” thrown and blanks drawn with my description, I do apologize. I would like to list my thoughts on how to improve the process and get your input on each; also, any suggestions of other areas I should look into that I am not touching on would be appreciated.
Please let me know if I can help clarify any info.
1. Have body bore EDM drilled slightly undersized and then finish to size using jig grinding. This will improve surface finish of bore while removing slag layer created during EDM. Jig grinding should also be a more cost effective method for maintaining a tolerance of +/- .0005 as compared to EDM.
2. Inspect bore after jig grinding with (+)(-) z class pins. If work is questionable, then inspect using same size x class pins.
3. Have slugs manufactured from material that is more comparable to the body material. The body is manufactured with 4140 alloy steel. The slugs are currently manufactured using D2. Both are tempered to a Rockwell value of 54 – 60 HRc.
4. Increase interference and freeze fit slug into body in order to reduce the chance of damage to the ID bore during inserting. The use of Loctite 620 would still be used to aid in retaining / sealing the fit.