Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Inventor general usability 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

tph216

Mechanical
Jan 14, 2010
35
Hi,

I have come onto using Inventor at a clients request (from Solidworks & NX), and am finding myself astounded by the shoddiness of the way in which Inventor does various things. I am here to check whether this is just me using the program wrong, or whether I am actually operating it correctly (i.e. I don't want to blame my tools if it's me who's at fault).

Now, what I have found, is that inventor almost forces me to model in a slow manner. It actually creates work for me!?

For example, when I start a sketch, I cannot dimension from the origin axes or planes. I have to first project them into the new sketch, creating new entities. Why? Why aren't these automatically directly referencable in all new sketches? Why create new redundant entities for these objects in the first place? I cannot fathom a benefit in doing it this way.

This may seem like a trivial complaint, but it means, for example, that I then have to do two time consuming things as a matter of routine:

1) Carry out the operation of creating these datums in every new sketch (i.e. turn on visibility of the master datums, "include / project geometry" for them all, turn off visibility of the master datums, use the newly created datums, then turn off visibility of the new datums each time I'm done using them, so they don't obscure the rest of my model).

2) Control the visibility of sets of datums under multiple parts, sketches and piping runs. For example, today I made the whole Tube & Piping assembly invisible, then visible again, and this turned on the visibility for all included & projected geometry). From what I can tell, I will have to go through and manually make hundreds of planes invisible now. I could turn off display of user work planes / axes, but this will also obscure any local planes or axes I may need.

This is frustrating because every single occurrence of one of those planes or axes is redundant. They are creating unproductive work for me in managing the above.

In Solidworks there is one master set of datums all referencable from any sketch or feature. There is no redundancy, and visibility is much easier to control.

It seems to me that Inventor is breaking a fundamental rule of good database design. It is encouraging the creation of duplicated entities, whilst adding no new informational content.

Why?

Am I using it wrong?

(I have further examples of terribly frustrating things in Inventor, but don't want to ramble on any more than I have to here, and am really looking for solutions rather than just to moan about Inventor).

Any help / advice would be much appreciated. :)
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I should clarify further. We use Solidworks for concept development, and Catia for more consistent / detailed models for manufacture and issue. SpaceClaim is looking very impressive as a concept development modeller, and for import and tweaking of geometry from other systems. Especially for our engineers who are totally new to 3D modelling - getting them up to speed with feature based modelling is a costly process, and it seems quicker with SpaceClaim.

We'll see.

You didn't say whether you could model a tube faster using SW or Inventor.
 
I'm not a fan of conceptual modelers (you might also check out Inventor Fusion) becuase I think only a real expert can use them reliably (I worry what kind of hard-to-track garbage casual users will create without ever going to history based accountability).

Create a tube?
Sounds like "pipe cap" question. (inside joke going back years and years ago - model a tube could mean anything. If you put some more detailed information somewhere in here - I haven't bothered to read.

In general - I haven't figured out what the difference is between SWx and Inventor. Geometry is geomemetry. Two tools that do the same thing. Learn the tools.
 
Hi All,

WOW, this discussion really gets the blood boiling on both sides.

I have used Autocad from version 10 and I'm just learning Inventor. The company I've just joined doesn't have any 3D cad program but is looking to go with Solidworks. To this aim we have been given a 30 day trial and I'm supposed to learn as much as possible about Solidworks in that time.

At the moment, to me Inventor is much easier to use but out of all that has been said before there is only one comment that is really meaningful and that was made by "rollupswx"

"Geometry is geometry. Two tools that do the same thing. Learn the tools."

, then make your own decision on what works best for you.

Best Rgds,
Dave R.
 
21Pom,

There are minor differences between the two but essentially do the same thing. Just check to see if any of the strengths or weaknesses apply to the types of products you develop and make your choice based on that. It will also help you to use your evaluation time efficiently.

Additionally you need to think about hiring qualified staff. Generally speaking where I live it is a lot easier to find people with SWx experience but that is slowly changing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor