Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Irregular FOS type (b), ASME Y14.5-2018

Status
Not open for further replies.

Burunduk

Mechanical
May 2, 2019
2,339
Does anyone know why para. 3.35.1 (b) references Figure 7-40 as an example for a "feature or collection of features that may contain or be contained by an unrelated actual mating envelope other than a sphere, cylinder, or pair of parallel planes."?
Seems to me that the datum feature simulator for A is a pair of parallel planes, so why "other than"?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

From conversations I have had this figure is both incorrectly referenced and labeled. It says "Irregular and Regular Features of Size as Datum Features" - there are only iFOS in this figure and no rFOS (no directly toleranced DIMENSIONS only directly toleranced FEATURES - see The reference in 3.35.1(b) is also incorrect, all three datum features are pairs of parallel planes so they are all iFOSa, so the reference should be in 3.35.1(a).
 
chez311,
I think you are right. The title of the figure is misleading. Seems like the error was caused by carrying over the figure from the '09 standard (Fig. 4-33) with the title unchanged while changing the 80 dimension to basic and controlling the sides by profile. In the 2009 standard, I suppose it was meant as a directly toleranced dimension although the lack of tolerance seemed odd (In a real-world application I would look for a title block general tolerance but it isn't typical for figures in the standard). It's unfortunate because the committee was on the right track of clarifying the confusion between "directly toleranced feature" and a "directly toleranced dimension" which is related to Regular FOS, defining a "directly toleranced dimension" in a separate paragraph (3.27). However, the title of figure 7-40 may contribute to people keeping thinking that the basic 80 and 30 widths are regular FOS. The reference to this figure from the "type b" FOS definition makes things even worse.
 
Chez311,
You seem to know this stuff. Could you, please clarify my doubts in the referenced discussion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor