apbanal
Electrical
- May 15, 2014
- 6
Hi to ALL,
Good day to engineers!
I just wanna ask your valuable technical inputs or experiences about the IS Limiter that we are planning to use as one of the solution to limit the fault current.
We are building a new substation with four (4) parallel transformers (115/13.8kV). The 13.8kV side are interconnected with each other (with Tie CBs) but not a ring configuration and one of the requirements is to limit the fault current at the 13.8kV bus below 25kA. Based on the study and considering also the impedance and voltage requirements, IS Limiter has been proposed to install on the CENTER TIE CB with two (2) transformers at one side and two (2) transformers at the other side. During fault condition on either on the buses, it will operate and separates the system into two. Thus, only two remaining transformers will supply the fault (which is less than 25kA)and then the protection relay will take charge of the fault to isolate.
My question are below:
1. ABB told us that IS Limiter is a cross flow equipment (operates in either direction), Does it mean that we can have a different trip setting on either of the directions? I mean a different settings on each directions? The reason i ask this is because we are installing first three (3) transformers, so two (2) transformers on the other side of the IS Limter and one (1) transformer on the other side of the IS Limiter. And the contribution of fault level on each of the four transformer at 13.8kV side is around 10kA. So, if there is a fault on one side of the IS Limiter (two transformers), it is around 10kA that will pass to the IS Limiter while if there is a fault on the other side (one transformer), it is around 20kA that will pass to the IS Limiter.
2. Doe the setting can be easily adjusted?
3. Any nuissance trippings encountered?
Im very sorry guys if my post is too long. I just wanna explain our set-up and hope you will understand the way i explain.
Am hoping for your inputs and experiences with this type of protection equipment.
Again thank you very much for the help in advance.
Regards,
apbanal
Good day to engineers!
I just wanna ask your valuable technical inputs or experiences about the IS Limiter that we are planning to use as one of the solution to limit the fault current.
We are building a new substation with four (4) parallel transformers (115/13.8kV). The 13.8kV side are interconnected with each other (with Tie CBs) but not a ring configuration and one of the requirements is to limit the fault current at the 13.8kV bus below 25kA. Based on the study and considering also the impedance and voltage requirements, IS Limiter has been proposed to install on the CENTER TIE CB with two (2) transformers at one side and two (2) transformers at the other side. During fault condition on either on the buses, it will operate and separates the system into two. Thus, only two remaining transformers will supply the fault (which is less than 25kA)and then the protection relay will take charge of the fault to isolate.
My question are below:
1. ABB told us that IS Limiter is a cross flow equipment (operates in either direction), Does it mean that we can have a different trip setting on either of the directions? I mean a different settings on each directions? The reason i ask this is because we are installing first three (3) transformers, so two (2) transformers on the other side of the IS Limter and one (1) transformer on the other side of the IS Limiter. And the contribution of fault level on each of the four transformer at 13.8kV side is around 10kA. So, if there is a fault on one side of the IS Limiter (two transformers), it is around 10kA that will pass to the IS Limiter while if there is a fault on the other side (one transformer), it is around 20kA that will pass to the IS Limiter.
2. Doe the setting can be easily adjusted?
3. Any nuissance trippings encountered?
Im very sorry guys if my post is too long. I just wanna explain our set-up and hope you will understand the way i explain.
Am hoping for your inputs and experiences with this type of protection equipment.
Again thank you very much for the help in advance.
Regards,
apbanal