khu
Civil/Environmental
- Aug 8, 2019
- 25
I have a project that is adding a bike lane, ditch, and sidewalk to an existing highway. We were directed by the client to maintain the existing lane and start our improvements at the edge of the lane (sawcutting inside and keeping lane line).
One of the PMs in our office is adamant that the alignment defining the project needs to be located at the center of ROW. The issue is that the centerline of the road does not even follow this exactly and the edge of travel lane is not a consistent offset from the center of the road (or ROW). Since our project offsets are all defined by the edge of travel lane this means that we have no way to show a typical section with consistent offset from the alignment.
I guess I've never heard of this requirement and we create arbitrary alignments all the time. I always understood that the project documents control the definitions for the reference point for improvements and that a legal description of the ROW boundaries does not ultimately matter for the purpose of defining improvements. Obviously ROW needs to be understood so as to not encroach on adjacent properties.
One of the PMs in our office is adamant that the alignment defining the project needs to be located at the center of ROW. The issue is that the centerline of the road does not even follow this exactly and the edge of travel lane is not a consistent offset from the center of the road (or ROW). Since our project offsets are all defined by the edge of travel lane this means that we have no way to show a typical section with consistent offset from the alignment.
I guess I've never heard of this requirement and we create arbitrary alignments all the time. I always understood that the project documents control the definitions for the reference point for improvements and that a legal description of the ROW boundaries does not ultimately matter for the purpose of defining improvements. Obviously ROW needs to be understood so as to not encroach on adjacent properties.