Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ISO - Flatness CZ of Offset Features

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mech1595

Mechanical
Oct 16, 2023
31
Hello All,

I received a customer print for review with the following callout for [Flatness | 0.1 CZ] for the two identified surfaces. I created an example with a simplified model below, but kept all of the notes/callouts/etc. the same as the customer print.

My experience is limited with ISO GPS, but I understand the concept of CZ when applied to co-planar surfaces (as shown in the second image). I'm just a little confused on what the tolerance zone will look like in this example, with the two offset surfaces. Is this still just a form control? Do I treat it as two separate (but parallel) tolerance zones, and ignore the basic offset?


ISO_CZ_Example_fpbn9p.jpg



Second image pulled from ISO 1101 for reference
ISO_GPS_ldlr7l.jpg
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Per ISO 5458:2018, flatness and strainghtness can define a pattern and control not only the orientation but also the location of features in a group, but in condition that the features are coaxial or coplanar. So in OP's case flatness should not be used since the surfaces are not coplanar. Please refer to the screenshot from ISO 5458.

2024-08-14_16_55_48-ISO_5458_2018_Pattern_and_combined_geometrical_tolerancing.pdf_-_Adobe_Acrobat_R_mulozt.png
2024-08-14_16_55_21-ISO_5458_2018_Pattern_and_combined_geometrical_tolerancing.pdf_-_Adobe_Acrobat_R_ilrjap.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor