Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

joint efficiency of the welds

Status
Not open for further replies.

AmoorSaleh

Mechanical
Aug 16, 2014
5
Dear All,
I need your help choosing the joint efficiency of the welds,
Assume
Given:-
• hemispherical head which assembled to the shell by "type No (2):- single
Welded butt joint with backing strip… see sketch UW-13.1 (i) ".
• the manufacturer decides to do Spot just for the longitudinal weld!!!
• the circumferential weld for the assembled head to shell is done without any Radiographic examination!!
• I have to draw your attention to: the hemispherical head was formed by one piece only(seamless)
The question is:
The joint efficiency for the head thickness according to the Book should be 0.65, 0.85 or 1 ?

Could you please explain to me how to use it?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Buttweld using a backing strip is not elegible for 85% or 100%. Making this a VERY poor engineering choice. You spent the money for a hemispherical head, and now the engineer wants to only use a little over half of the available thickness [via a low joint efficiency].

Based on the cost of hemi heads, in the USA we always use full-penn weld joints and "Full RT" to get 100% joint efficiency. Thus we can use 100% of the thickness of that expensive hemi head in our pressure calc's.
 
Duwe6,
It is unfortunate that some Engineers have no idea of costs. Engineers in name only! A bit more radiography to provide thinner walls is most often miniscule compared to the greater material and welding costs.
 
Yep weldstan, you got that right.
No RT = 70% joint efficiency = can only use 70% of the as-built material thickness.
Spot RT = 85% E = a 21½% increase in usable material thickness.
On a small vessel where only one welder did all the long seams, that is about 1 to 4 RT's. Total cost $200 - $500 to add 21½% thickness to your $10K to $85K vessel. Talk about cost efficient project amnagement!

And there are still a bunch of "engineers" that cannot grasp this basic principle.
 

Hello Duwe6's and weldstan,
Thank you a lot .. [smile]
I agree with you that it is a very poor design!!
But in this case the E joint efficiency should be 0.8, is it true?

According to UW-12
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor