Our company's standard PC platform is the IBM Thinkpad. Personally I wouldn't use it to hold a table leg that is too short up. Why?
(1) We develop all of our Wonderware graphics at no less than 1280 x 1024 resolution. Sometimes higher. Dell (and probably others) has a laptop that can be set to 1280 x 1024 without overscan. According to our IT people, at the time of the replacement of my laptop (also a Dell running W2K) IBM didn't offer that resolution
(2) We have had nothing but trouble from the single IBM that we volunteered to try (person does not develop graphics). The serial port works intermittantly. He is trying a USB-Serial converter. If that doesn't fix the problem then we are swapping back to a Dell.
(3) XP, while a nice OS for IT people, is, in my opinion, a pig, while offering little more than a few gee-whiz doo dads for the end user. It takes up too much hard drive space and too much RAM. While not necessarily a PC issue, it can become an issue to a technician or programmer. You can get by with a low end, IBM laptop if you don't develop high res graphics and you use an OS like W2K. Otherwise you might want to move your PC quality up a notch.
I should add that we don't have the kinds of issues we have with IBM laptops with IBM desktops. We are migrating our older Dell control PC's to new IBM boxes and so far have not had any trouble.
I try not to weigh in on brand specific issues with too much of a slant but this particular subject has been a 3 year battle with our IT Dept. One day IBM will step up to the plate with a decent laptop screen and decent graphics card and I will lose the battle. They may have already done so but the price may be too high. I don't know. Out of 30 or so technicians across the company that had to "upgrade" to IBM laptops when the IT Dept rolled out XP, all of them kept their Dells so that they could do their job.