crshears
Electrical
- Mar 23, 2013
- 1,818
Hello all,
In the past I've posted about my volunteer involvement aboard a historic vessel. For the interested, those posts can be found at:
and
Moving on...
I've recently agreed to take on the task of assessing said vessel's electrical system, principally because nobody more qualified can be found to do the job, and the need is desperate.
The vessel was originally powered with two steam-engine-driven dynamos, each rated to provide a 30 kW output at 125VDC. I'm in the very early stages of gathering information, but the electrical system appears to have been operated ungrounded; the three distribution panels I've looked at so far all have two bus bars running down the centre, with lateral double pole single throw switches supplying each branch circuit. The load sides of said switches are fused in both legs.
Since the vessel's retirement and transition into a museum, the electrical system has been converted to a 120/240 VAC configuration with a grounded neutral, which is where it gets interesting...
The aforementioned panels are thus now wired with one bus bar hot and the other at effective ground potential. However, in two of the panels the hot bus bar is on the left while in the third it is on the right...
In many cases I found fuses of too high a rating for the circuit they were protecting, and these I promptly replaced with fuses of the correct rating...with a caveat:
I was horrified to find that in numerous cases the 'neutral' fuse was of a lower rating than the 'hot' fuse, meaning that if a branch circuit 'neutral' fuse were to blow for any reason the circuit itself [depending on fault magnitude] could remain live via the higher rated 'hot' fuse. In these instances I placed a fuse of the correct rating in the 'hot' side with a deliberately higher-rated fuse in the neutral side in an effort to achieve some level of fuse co-ordination.
Another concern I have yet to investigate is whether any attempt was made to observe the correct polarity when converting the system to AC, in other words if for example the shells of all the lamp sockets are connected to neutral and all centre 'buttons' are connected to hot...or whether any attention was even paid to this when the vessel was first laid down, meaning that some lamp socket shells might now be hot while others are connected to neutral...
I'm posting this here because it was in this forum that the question of whether a distribution system should be grounded or ungrounded was once discussed. The vessel has essentially been put to bed for the [northern-hemisphere] winter, so nobody will be working on board until the spring. I'm wondering whether I should even consider going to an ungrounded neutral system [since this requires added vigilance which might not avail over the winter], or if it would be better to stick with a grounded neutral and swap branch circuit polarities as needed to clean up the safety issue of hot shells.
Based on what I've provided, I'd appreciate any advice on how to proceed in the short term to keep the old girl safe and from catching fire which, considering she has a supertructure with wood overlay, would be disastrous...
I'm also looking for a recommendation as to how best to proceed with insulation assessment; a hand-crank megger rated at 300 volts would probably be ideal, as well as historically authentic...if I can even locate such a beast; but I don't want in any fashion to let that stop me if employing more modern metering techniques would enhance my abilities to detect the presence of problems I might otherwise miss.
Thanks.
In the past I've posted about my volunteer involvement aboard a historic vessel. For the interested, those posts can be found at:
and
Moving on...
I've recently agreed to take on the task of assessing said vessel's electrical system, principally because nobody more qualified can be found to do the job, and the need is desperate.
The vessel was originally powered with two steam-engine-driven dynamos, each rated to provide a 30 kW output at 125VDC. I'm in the very early stages of gathering information, but the electrical system appears to have been operated ungrounded; the three distribution panels I've looked at so far all have two bus bars running down the centre, with lateral double pole single throw switches supplying each branch circuit. The load sides of said switches are fused in both legs.
Since the vessel's retirement and transition into a museum, the electrical system has been converted to a 120/240 VAC configuration with a grounded neutral, which is where it gets interesting...
The aforementioned panels are thus now wired with one bus bar hot and the other at effective ground potential. However, in two of the panels the hot bus bar is on the left while in the third it is on the right...
In many cases I found fuses of too high a rating for the circuit they were protecting, and these I promptly replaced with fuses of the correct rating...with a caveat:
I was horrified to find that in numerous cases the 'neutral' fuse was of a lower rating than the 'hot' fuse, meaning that if a branch circuit 'neutral' fuse were to blow for any reason the circuit itself [depending on fault magnitude] could remain live via the higher rated 'hot' fuse. In these instances I placed a fuse of the correct rating in the 'hot' side with a deliberately higher-rated fuse in the neutral side in an effort to achieve some level of fuse co-ordination.
Another concern I have yet to investigate is whether any attempt was made to observe the correct polarity when converting the system to AC, in other words if for example the shells of all the lamp sockets are connected to neutral and all centre 'buttons' are connected to hot...or whether any attention was even paid to this when the vessel was first laid down, meaning that some lamp socket shells might now be hot while others are connected to neutral...
I'm posting this here because it was in this forum that the question of whether a distribution system should be grounded or ungrounded was once discussed. The vessel has essentially been put to bed for the [northern-hemisphere] winter, so nobody will be working on board until the spring. I'm wondering whether I should even consider going to an ungrounded neutral system [since this requires added vigilance which might not avail over the winter], or if it would be better to stick with a grounded neutral and swap branch circuit polarities as needed to clean up the safety issue of hot shells.
Based on what I've provided, I'd appreciate any advice on how to proceed in the short term to keep the old girl safe and from catching fire which, considering she has a supertructure with wood overlay, would be disastrous...
I'm also looking for a recommendation as to how best to proceed with insulation assessment; a hand-crank megger rated at 300 volts would probably be ideal, as well as historically authentic...if I can even locate such a beast; but I don't want in any fashion to let that stop me if employing more modern metering techniques would enhance my abilities to detect the presence of problems I might otherwise miss.
Thanks.