guilio2010
Electrical
- Nov 8, 2012
- 80
So I wanted to get some feedback or ideas on a recent lightning storm that caused damage on some equipment.
During a lightning storm, a din rail of containing terminal blocks was damaged. In Pic 2 of the din rail, you see where a shield terminal block was connected but the contacts burnt through the rail (Pic1). On one end of the shielded terminal block was connected to an isolated ground bar. The ground wire that was connected to this was connected to a isolated ground bar. That wire was replaced due to it being damaged (reports mention it was broken in half). This ground bar has a 2AWG leading from the cabinet (Pic4) and travels under ground to off location to a ground grid, but during the run, it taps into and connects to some of the equipment ground. The next photo (pic2) shows one side of the din rail that is blacken, that feeds into the controller cards. Behind the wires (pic3), you see a screw where the din rail arced through. Pic5 shows a bolt that connected to the subpanel and some blackness around it. The door was blown open. Majority of the instruments connected to the RTU was replaced due to damage. No other din rails has signs of damage as extent as this.
Going to the basics here is my thought process.
-For the ground wire to be blown in half, the voltage had to exceed the maximum specs. This would be equivalent to inducing a high pressure on a pipe. The pipe will bust.
-The current being induced on the din rail melted the contacts from the shield terminal blocks to the din rail.
-The current induced on the din rail began to melt with the screw and once separation occurred with the screw to din rail, arcing began due to voltage levels.
-The wires going to the controller on the lefts side were blacken, and I think this is due to the arc flashing. However, there were ground wires connected to a card in the RTU, but the wires are only blacken on one end.
Here are the questions I have:
1) Where could the source originate at? I think there was a very close strike, where the lightning struck the ground, went through the ground wire and into the cabinet before being dissipated through the ground again. I have arguments stated that lightning will not come through ground since it can not travel up. I get the philosophy as if you take a high pressure pipe filled with product and open a valve to atmosphere, the liquid can not travel back into the pipe once into atmosphere, but again, the lightning is a source of power, so why can't lightning send power in the ground, energize the ground wire and loop through? Others feel it was a device or equipment, but no signs exist of a direct lightning strike.
2) I understand the philosophy lightning goes to ground and dissipates, but I argue the point if lighting strikes the ground directly, it does energize that ground and if the resistance of 2 paths exist, then the current will be proportional to that path of resistance. Hence if you take lightning strike near a ground wire, then the ground wire will pick up the power, but since the ground wire is large, the resistance is very low compared to other sources, it mostly travels back to ground. Thus, the other end may have some blow fuses if designed correctly.
3) Why would only 1 din rail see this type of extensive damage but the other don't? I would expect the same type of burning effect on the other din rails. Same with the isolated ground, only 1 wire burnt up.
Thanks,
guilio
During a lightning storm, a din rail of containing terminal blocks was damaged. In Pic 2 of the din rail, you see where a shield terminal block was connected but the contacts burnt through the rail (Pic1). On one end of the shielded terminal block was connected to an isolated ground bar. The ground wire that was connected to this was connected to a isolated ground bar. That wire was replaced due to it being damaged (reports mention it was broken in half). This ground bar has a 2AWG leading from the cabinet (Pic4) and travels under ground to off location to a ground grid, but during the run, it taps into and connects to some of the equipment ground. The next photo (pic2) shows one side of the din rail that is blacken, that feeds into the controller cards. Behind the wires (pic3), you see a screw where the din rail arced through. Pic5 shows a bolt that connected to the subpanel and some blackness around it. The door was blown open. Majority of the instruments connected to the RTU was replaced due to damage. No other din rails has signs of damage as extent as this.
Going to the basics here is my thought process.
-For the ground wire to be blown in half, the voltage had to exceed the maximum specs. This would be equivalent to inducing a high pressure on a pipe. The pipe will bust.
-The current being induced on the din rail melted the contacts from the shield terminal blocks to the din rail.
-The current induced on the din rail began to melt with the screw and once separation occurred with the screw to din rail, arcing began due to voltage levels.
-The wires going to the controller on the lefts side were blacken, and I think this is due to the arc flashing. However, there were ground wires connected to a card in the RTU, but the wires are only blacken on one end.
Here are the questions I have:
1) Where could the source originate at? I think there was a very close strike, where the lightning struck the ground, went through the ground wire and into the cabinet before being dissipated through the ground again. I have arguments stated that lightning will not come through ground since it can not travel up. I get the philosophy as if you take a high pressure pipe filled with product and open a valve to atmosphere, the liquid can not travel back into the pipe once into atmosphere, but again, the lightning is a source of power, so why can't lightning send power in the ground, energize the ground wire and loop through? Others feel it was a device or equipment, but no signs exist of a direct lightning strike.
2) I understand the philosophy lightning goes to ground and dissipates, but I argue the point if lighting strikes the ground directly, it does energize that ground and if the resistance of 2 paths exist, then the current will be proportional to that path of resistance. Hence if you take lightning strike near a ground wire, then the ground wire will pick up the power, but since the ground wire is large, the resistance is very low compared to other sources, it mostly travels back to ground. Thus, the other end may have some blow fuses if designed correctly.
3) Why would only 1 din rail see this type of extensive damage but the other don't? I would expect the same type of burning effect on the other din rails. Same with the isolated ground, only 1 wire burnt up.
Thanks,
guilio