Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

LN2 dewar in a airplane

Status
Not open for further replies.

jonathanlavoie

Aerospace
Nov 5, 2012
3
Here's my system (at the design stage):

-Two Dewar to hold each one infrared sensors.
-The Dewar are filled with liquid nitrogen
-The Dewar are inside a vacuum chamber, so we'll have LN2 feed through for refill and exhaust. Four in total.
-The vacuum chamber is inside a small plane (bigger than a Cesna, but still small)
I presume there will be around 1L or less of liquid nitrogen, spend over the course of 12 hours.

I don't know a lot about cryogenic stuff, or airplane, as a matter of fact.

Here's my questions
-Does anyone know if there can be problem if we have the pressure relief valve inside the aircraft? They can stay in flight for at least 4 hours, at an altitude of 5000m?
-Do you think that if we provide a tube with an interface to the in-line relief pressure valve and one end is outside the airplane, it can clog up to the point it is dangerous to build-up a pressure?

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

My guess is that they will want the N2 vented.
Have you thought of using TEC for the sensors? (thermo electric cooler)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
 
TEC work well in small difference of temperature. I think 240C (40C to 80 Kelvin) of difference will be too complicated and too power hungry.
Another solution is a Stirling cooler, but it produce too much vibration as we have positioning requirement for the sensor of about 3µm.

---------
Jonathan Lavoie
Physics engineer
Optical designer, Space photonics
 
How about a TEC with LN2 on the hot side?
Then you could just vent the exhaust through a control valve.
And the TEC would only be cooling from the LN2 temp.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
 
I think it will only make things worse, because of the heat dissipation the TEC will do.

If I have a sensors that produce X watts, a thermal conduction and loss through the Dewar of Y watts and a light-electricity conversion loss of Z watts.
I need an amount of nitrogen that is converted to gas with an energy of boiling of X+Y+Z watts.
If I have a TEC to cool my sensor down, it needs to cool it down of X+Y+Z watts, but produce T watts in the process.

If I use the system for 4 hours, I need the system to be stable, so I need an amount of nitrogen that is converted to gas with an energy of boiling of X+Y+Z+T watts.


So I use more nitrogen, but can achieve lower temperature, but I don't need that.


---------
Jonathan Lavoie
Physics engineer
Optical designer, Space photonics
 
I would vent out side the cockpit. If possible keep everything outside the cockpit in case there is a leak.

Have you considered frost build up?

How stable does you temperature need to be? Adding LN2 or venting the N2 will change the temperature.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor