prblmfxr
Civil/Environmental
- Oct 12, 2000
- 21
Looking for opinions on the best way to analyze the following situation:
One-way concrete slab reinforced top & bottom both ways, 6 1/2" thick with 1" Kalman topping (7 1/2" thick total).
Slab supported by WF steel beams @ 6'-8" O.C. with top flange embedded in slab (no shear studs). Beams frame into WF steel girders spaced @ 20'-0" O.C. with top flange embedded in slab (no shear studs). Beams & girders frame into steel columns on a 20' by 20' grid. Slab designed (and confirmed) for 500 psf LL and 100 psf DL.
The problem: the floor is used as a warehouse area, using heavy-duty storage racks typically used on slabs-on-grade. Obviously, the storage rack legs create high point loads on the slab. How can I get accurate results for shear, moment, deflection based on this point loading. I need to know if the floor is being overloaded.
It seems to me that applying the loads over a 1' strip of slab and analyzing as a 1' wide conc. beam would be way to conservative. Am I right or wrong? Any suggestions?
One-way concrete slab reinforced top & bottom both ways, 6 1/2" thick with 1" Kalman topping (7 1/2" thick total).
Slab supported by WF steel beams @ 6'-8" O.C. with top flange embedded in slab (no shear studs). Beams frame into WF steel girders spaced @ 20'-0" O.C. with top flange embedded in slab (no shear studs). Beams & girders frame into steel columns on a 20' by 20' grid. Slab designed (and confirmed) for 500 psf LL and 100 psf DL.
The problem: the floor is used as a warehouse area, using heavy-duty storage racks typically used on slabs-on-grade. Obviously, the storage rack legs create high point loads on the slab. How can I get accurate results for shear, moment, deflection based on this point loading. I need to know if the floor is being overloaded.
It seems to me that applying the loads over a 1' strip of slab and analyzing as a 1' wide conc. beam would be way to conservative. Am I right or wrong? Any suggestions?