jistre
Mechanical
- Oct 1, 2003
- 1,147
I'm trying to figure out what happens to psychrometry when air gets really cold. I'm trying to get a handle on the TR required to bring air down to -65, but I have two problems. One, the ASHRAE charts only go down to -40. Two, it makes no sense to me to talk of relative humidity once air gets below 32F. The ASHRAE low temp charts follow this, as the chart I'm looking at does not have RH lines below 32F.
So, I guess my questions for you guys are
1) Is there a such thing as a psychro chart for -65F or equations of state that can be used at those low temps?
2) Is my thinking about air and RH below 32F on the mark? To me, it seems like you can chill air until 32F saturated, then the water begins precipitating out as a solid, then the air continues chilling as dry air to final temps. My gut tells me that to calculate loads, you'd start at the initial air state, then find the enthalpy difference between there and 32F saturated. Then, the absolute humidity would be used to calculate the amount of water in the air at 32F saturated, and the heat of fusion for that amount of water would be added to the load. Finally, the air would be treated as dry from 32F to -65F to calculate the third component. Does this seem reasonable?
So, I guess my questions for you guys are
1) Is there a such thing as a psychro chart for -65F or equations of state that can be used at those low temps?
2) Is my thinking about air and RH below 32F on the mark? To me, it seems like you can chill air until 32F saturated, then the water begins precipitating out as a solid, then the air continues chilling as dry air to final temps. My gut tells me that to calculate loads, you'd start at the initial air state, then find the enthalpy difference between there and 32F saturated. Then, the absolute humidity would be used to calculate the amount of water in the air at 32F saturated, and the heat of fusion for that amount of water would be added to the load. Finally, the air would be treated as dry from 32F to -65F to calculate the third component. Does this seem reasonable?