Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

LWN with appendix 2 MAP lower than MAWP

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ehiman1

Civil/Environmental
Oct 17, 2014
59
Dear gents,
I have to check a long welding neck 2” #300 with corrosion allowance (3 mm) and external loads with ASME appendix 2, but doing so I found that MAP is lower than MAWP.
The required thickness is 20.3 mm and with LWN standard we have 20.7 mm.
I don’t understand how it is possible that MAP is lower than MAWP, someone could help me please?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Ehiman1, B16.5 flanges are known to often fail Apx 2 calculations due to the different methodologies.

You'll have to find another route.

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
Why are you doing this? Use it because of the corrosion allowance or the external loads? How are you handling the external loads with Appendix 2?
 
It is a client’s request when corrosion allowance is on the flange. I added an axial load and bending moment and calculated an equivalent pressure. Ah the same time they want I verify the rating and thickness of the flange against corrosion allowance
 
Ehiman1
Try with hand calculations.

Regards
 
It is very unusual that corrosion be applied to the flange thickness.

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
Use UG-44(b) for the external loads and ignore the corrosion allowance. The use of Appendix 2 on standard flanges is inappropriate. That is not the purpose of Appendix 2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor