apekim
Mechanical
- Nov 29, 2007
- 53
Im curious to understand how others are managing parts, particularly those that are purchased which may be shown in different orientations in many assemblies.
A good example are items that have retaining lanyards, like those quick-release pins. In each assembly that it is used, the lanyard may be bent a different way with the mtg tab oriented in any direction. The part number of this item must be the same in every assembly it is used.
In the past, many organizations that used Pro/E elected to use the item part number as the file name of the CAD object (in Pro/E, it is called the "name" of the item). So if a user wanted to create the same object but in a different configuration, they would have to name it something different so that it was unique in the CAD database, but still call out the correct part number in the parts list.
I know that several CAD tool vendors (Siemens is one of them) have been exploring the use of composite unique identifiers whereas it takes two fields of data instead of one to make a part unique in the database:
Example, P/N: 12345-1.prt Composite-Field:1, the next part would become P/N:12345-1.prt Composite-Field:2
I thought about doing something similar in Pro/E which could have the same functional result:
To use consecutive generic numbers for the file name, and then have a separate "part number" parameter that would be used to populate the parts list (instead of usign the file name):
Example, Pro/E Name: 11111.prt P/N Parameter: 12345-1, the next part would be: Pro/E Name: 11112.prt P/N Parameter: 12345-1 In this case, the Pro/E Name would be just for uniqueness only and not appear on any parts list. The P/N Parameter would contain the data that gets placed on the parts list.
Its difficult to implement a system like this when you are unsure of what is coming down the road in the future for data management functionality.
Thanks,
Mike
A good example are items that have retaining lanyards, like those quick-release pins. In each assembly that it is used, the lanyard may be bent a different way with the mtg tab oriented in any direction. The part number of this item must be the same in every assembly it is used.
In the past, many organizations that used Pro/E elected to use the item part number as the file name of the CAD object (in Pro/E, it is called the "name" of the item). So if a user wanted to create the same object but in a different configuration, they would have to name it something different so that it was unique in the CAD database, but still call out the correct part number in the parts list.
I know that several CAD tool vendors (Siemens is one of them) have been exploring the use of composite unique identifiers whereas it takes two fields of data instead of one to make a part unique in the database:
Example, P/N: 12345-1.prt Composite-Field:1, the next part would become P/N:12345-1.prt Composite-Field:2
I thought about doing something similar in Pro/E which could have the same functional result:
To use consecutive generic numbers for the file name, and then have a separate "part number" parameter that would be used to populate the parts list (instead of usign the file name):
Example, Pro/E Name: 11111.prt P/N Parameter: 12345-1, the next part would be: Pro/E Name: 11112.prt P/N Parameter: 12345-1 In this case, the Pro/E Name would be just for uniqueness only and not appear on any parts list. The P/N Parameter would contain the data that gets placed on the parts list.
Its difficult to implement a system like this when you are unsure of what is coming down the road in the future for data management functionality.
Thanks,
Mike