Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Maximum strain response not matching eigenfrequencies

Status
Not open for further replies.

OscarPacheco

Mechanical
Nov 11, 2015
25
0
0
ES
Hello.

I am doing a modal response analysis to one component which is bolted in its upper part. I first do a pretension step to take into account the force of the bolt, then I do *frequency step to obtain the natural frequencies and then I apply a unit sine sweep to obtain the responses. I am running in two different problems:
1) The stresses from the pretension step are only present in the frame 0 of the rest of the steps, but in the following frames it seems to dissapear.
2) If I plot, for example, the strain with respect to the frequency, the peaks of strain are not produced in the frequencies corresponding to eigenvalues (see image attached)

Can anyone help me? Thank you so much

Here is an example of the code I am using:

*AMPLITUDE, NAME=A1
20, 1, 1500, 1
**
*NMAP, NSET=NALL, TYPE=SCALE
0,0,0
1e-3, 1e-3, 1e-3
*BOUNDARY, FIXED
BC, 1,3
BC_Bolt, 1,3
**
**=============================================================================
** Pretension step
**=============================================================================
*STEP, name=preTension_of_M8_screw, NLGEOM=YES
*STATIC
*CLOAD
SolidPretension1_Frc, 1, -15e3
*OUTPUT, FIELD
*ELEMENT OUTPUT,ELSET=membrane
S
**#****NODE OUTPUT
**#***U
*END STEP
**
**=============================================================================
** Eigenfrequency Check
**=============================================================================
*Step, name=eigFreq_extraction, perturbation
*Frequency, eigensolver=Lanczos, acoustic coupling=off, normalization=mass
50, 0, 2000., , ,
*BOUNDARY, FIXED
SolidPretension1_Frc, 1,3
*OUTPUT, FIELD
**ELEMENT OUTPUT, ELSET=PartBody
**NODE OUTPUT
*END STEP
**=============================================================================
** Skaka Z
**=============================================================================
*STEP, name=SinusoidalAccZ, perturbation
Frequency response Z
*STEADY STATE DYNAMICS, INTERVAL=EIGENFREQUENCY
20, 1500, 20, 5
*MODAL DAMPING,MODAL=DIRECT
1, 100, 0.011
*BASE MOTION, DOF=3 , TYPE=ACCELERATION, AMP=A1
*OUTPUT, FIELD
*ELEMENT OUTPUT, ELSET=membrane
S,E
*NODE OUTPUT
*END STEP

 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=12b57dbc-7b4a-483f-b7cc-76ce9f18f54b&file=Capture.PNG
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Thanks for your reply. Do you mean then that this results are ok? The resonant frequency is for example 223,57 (from the .dat file, calculated in the second step) and the damped natural frequency is 220, 691 (from the graph, calculated in the third step). Damped frequency is a little bit lower than the resonant frequencies.
Thanks for your view
 
Maybe that's the problem in your understanding...

Abaqus Analysis Users Guide 6.1.3 General and linear perturbation procedures said:
Load magnitudes (including the magnitudes of prescribed boundary conditions) during a linear perturbation analysis step are defined as the magnitudes of the load perturbations only. Likewise, the value of any solution variable is output as the perturbation value only—the value of the variable in the base state is not included.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top