harveygp
Mechanical
- Jun 4, 2004
- 18
Looking at the fuel consumption of the rx8 in relation to the power output, it seems to be comparable with piston engine sport cars of similar (high) performance.
Doesn't that suggest that say a single rotor version of half the output (say 110hp) but in average use having a wider open throttle and only half the frictional loss would give a very acceptable power unit for a small saloon with good economy too.
The improvement over the previous rx7 engine seems very impressive but has been got through careful attention to detailed understanding. So the basic engine topology has much more to offer that anyone would have guessed a few years ago.
Should the industry in general be taking a new look at the Wankel topology? Maybe it already is?
Any comment from those who know a bit more than me/
Doesn't that suggest that say a single rotor version of half the output (say 110hp) but in average use having a wider open throttle and only half the frictional loss would give a very acceptable power unit for a small saloon with good economy too.
The improvement over the previous rx7 engine seems very impressive but has been got through careful attention to detailed understanding. So the basic engine topology has much more to offer that anyone would have guessed a few years ago.
Should the industry in general be taking a new look at the Wankel topology? Maybe it already is?
Any comment from those who know a bit more than me/