James, can you give us some detail on why you would not consider the Universal Transmission for your application?
I didn't know about Transfluid either. The hydraulic torque converter looks to be the same kind as the one Voith uses. Maybe someone can explain why this device is better than a hydraulic pump/motor for varying the speed.
An Israeli company, IQ Wind,
claims to have a variable pitch gear. They are applying it to wind turbines first. They compare a mechanical variable speed device to the hydraulic type like the Vorecon:
"Hydraulic systems are therefore less efficient relative to fully-mechanical variable solutions. This limitation is especially pronounced at low loads that account for most of the turbines’ working hours. In addition, a hydraulic torque converter does not obviate the need for a mechanical speed-up gear stage and thus, in practice, represents an additional gear stage leading to extra cost and complexity. Finally, hydraulic solutions introduce significant temperature management and environmental issues that do not exist in fully mechanical drive trains."
I know of a UK group that claims to have a method of converting the variable speed of a wind turbine rotor to constant speed for the generator. I asked them how they are doing it, not expecting to get any information. I didn't even get a reply. I can look up the location of this outfit if anyone wants to know. It is at one of the UK universities.
A German company claims that they can achieve variable to constant speed operation in a wind turbine by rotating the gearcase of an inline shaft gearbox at a speed required to provide constant output speed given the varying input speed. This is an old idea. Henry Ford used it in the Model T. It is the principle of all modern automatic transmissions.
But in the German arrangement, to avoid a high rotational speed of the gearcase at one end of the speed range, they allow the cage to rotate one direction at varying speeds for part of the range and in the reverse direction for the other part. In other words, they put power into the gearcase for one part of the range and take it out for the other part. This reversal of direction may be acceptable but it is not ideal. They must use a motor/generator for this operation, and have some means of absorbing the generated power.
For your case, James, using the German arrangement, if you have a gearbox of about 6.66 ratio and input a constant speed of 1500 rpm from the motor, you would get 10,000 rpm out with an almost stationary gearcase. To increase the output speed to 15000 rpm with 1500 rpm input, you must rotate the cage about 880 rpm in the direction opposite to the motor rotation. This is theoretically possible, but a large gearcase rotating at 880 rpm may not be practical.