Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Methanol timing vs e85 timing 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ron bown

Automotive
Apr 26, 2019
1
0
0
US
Going back a few years to this thread. Why does methanol want so much more timing than E85. I pull the off of Facebook. This guy among a bunch of other guys are running in the single-digit timing on full boost. Guys that run methanol some of them are in the 30 degree range under full boost.
Turbo LS, 24psi, non intercooled E85, timing at 9° under full boost. R5671A-9 NGKs. Plugs 1,3,5,7 in top pic, 2,4,6,8 in bottom. These plugs have one burnout and 1/8 mile pass. Car was shut down and towed back to the pits. Plugs have been shot with brake kleen. What does it need? Looks like 1 and 5 are close on timing but I was thinking the other 6 needed more. Thoughts?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

As racing fuels go the only thing better than methanol is nitromethane blended with methanol to whatever strength the engine design can take. Methanol has higher knock resistance and burns more slowly than E85, for instance, all other things being equal. The stoichiometric air/fuel ratio of methanol is lower than E85, so more mass of methanol needs to be evaporated in the air prior to combustion - this means the evaporative cooling effect of methanol is greater than E85 for a given amount of air. This collateral charge cooling effect also influences toward greater knock margin and slower combustion.
An engine that is purpose built for methanol would employ higher compression ratio and/or higher boost pressure than an equivalent engine optimized for E85. A well designed methanol engine would have significantly greater knock limited horsepower potential than an equally well designed E85 engine.
Most likely the ideal spark timing for a fully optimized methanol engine would not be all that different from the optimized spark timing of a lower HP equally optimized E85 engine.

"Schiefgehen wird, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz
 
I would suspect cyl-to-cyl variations in AFR. With very high fuel rates to is very difficult to get uniform distribution.
One reason that some people use two stages of injection, one in TB and the rest in injectors in each runner.
This is one reason that fuels with added oxidizers appear to be more tolerant.
I believe that HEMI is spot on, the differences in timing are largely to compensate for lack of optimization. I have seen similar numbers in other systems.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
 
Are you subscribing to the school of plug reading that affixes great importance to the change in color along the curved ground electrode ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top