pmover
Mechanical
- Sep 7, 2001
- 1,507
all,
this question is directed to skilled engrs whom practice hvac. i've studied hvac (college) and extensively worked in the hvac industry, but have not done any hvac design work. so i am inquisitive!
this question is realted to arch5599 post on 05-01-03.
i heard of engineers determining heat loads (or cooling loads?) based on a Btu/hr-sq.ft and by ASHRAE standards (fundamentals handbook) - determining overall room/bldg U based on design of bldg. i understand that there is a difference in construction (residential and commercial), and considering what tools are available,...
Please clarify which method is actually practiced most often and for what reasons (client specified?)
for what reasons is the Btu/hr-sq.ft method used?
the Btu/hr-sq.ft method seems too simple and can provide results which lead to over/undersized equipment (example of air conditioners running 100% of time during summer months in houston, tx and not keeping apt. rooms adequately cooled).
which method provides results that are realistic - i understand that in the hcav world, results can vary >10%, depending upon method used.
it seems to me that determining heating and cooling loads as stated in the ahsrae fundamental handbook )or by other recognized industry stds) is the more appropriate and professional method.
thanks!
-pmover
this question is directed to skilled engrs whom practice hvac. i've studied hvac (college) and extensively worked in the hvac industry, but have not done any hvac design work. so i am inquisitive!
this question is realted to arch5599 post on 05-01-03.
i heard of engineers determining heat loads (or cooling loads?) based on a Btu/hr-sq.ft and by ASHRAE standards (fundamentals handbook) - determining overall room/bldg U based on design of bldg. i understand that there is a difference in construction (residential and commercial), and considering what tools are available,...
Please clarify which method is actually practiced most often and for what reasons (client specified?)
for what reasons is the Btu/hr-sq.ft method used?
the Btu/hr-sq.ft method seems too simple and can provide results which lead to over/undersized equipment (example of air conditioners running 100% of time during summer months in houston, tx and not keeping apt. rooms adequately cooled).
which method provides results that are realistic - i understand that in the hcav world, results can vary >10%, depending upon method used.
it seems to me that determining heating and cooling loads as stated in the ahsrae fundamental handbook )or by other recognized industry stds) is the more appropriate and professional method.
thanks!
-pmover