Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
-
Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Mirror Solids with sketches 1
- Thread starter aitchem
- Start date
-
1
- #2
Because V5 uses a hierarchial database (it doesn't store the final geometry - just the steps to create it), you can't mirror everything.
I've been trying to figure out an easy way to mirror similar, but not exactly opposite parts, and the best I've come up with is to model the second part from scratch.
I've been trying to figure out an easy way to mirror similar, but not exactly opposite parts, and the best I've come up with is to model the second part from scratch.
- Thread starter
- #4
While this (and a few other things) may be tougher in V5 than they were in V4, there are so many other ways that V5 shines over V4. I can show you where we have saved 6 weeks over V4 on specific design tasks.
It's easy to say "I can't do this in V5 like I can in V4". The real challenge, and the real way to get the job done, is to ask "What is the end job that I need done", and find out how to do it. You will usually find that you can do it a different way in V5 than you did in V4, and you can save much time doing it that way.
In your case, Do you really need the support geometry mirrored? Or do you just need the final solid? Can you find a way to make the appropriate changes on the "original" part so that the final, mirrored part looks correct? Can you simply start with the original part mirrored and make some pads, pockets, holes, etc. to come up with the final part? Is there some common, fundamental geometry that could be put into a 3rd CATPart document, and then use that to create your left and right hand parts?
Much of the key to the power of V5 is not in simply creating the geometry. Building solids is pretty much the same in all CAD modellers. Some have these tools, some have those tools, but it all boils down to the same. The real key to the power of V5 is in it's ability to modify and re-use the design intent of your original designs, so that follow-on designs can be created faster.
I'll get off of my soapbox now.
It's easy to say "I can't do this in V5 like I can in V4". The real challenge, and the real way to get the job done, is to ask "What is the end job that I need done", and find out how to do it. You will usually find that you can do it a different way in V5 than you did in V4, and you can save much time doing it that way.
In your case, Do you really need the support geometry mirrored? Or do you just need the final solid? Can you find a way to make the appropriate changes on the "original" part so that the final, mirrored part looks correct? Can you simply start with the original part mirrored and make some pads, pockets, holes, etc. to come up with the final part? Is there some common, fundamental geometry that could be put into a 3rd CATPart document, and then use that to create your left and right hand parts?
Much of the key to the power of V5 is not in simply creating the geometry. Building solids is pretty much the same in all CAD modellers. Some have these tools, some have those tools, but it all boils down to the same. The real key to the power of V5 is in it's ability to modify and re-use the design intent of your original designs, so that follow-on designs can be created faster.
I'll get off of my soapbox now.
- Thread starter
- #6
I agree with you on all points, I , personally am a big fan of V5.
However, I have to work to the ability of the lowest common denominator in my client's office. The 15 years on V4 dinosaur who doesn't want the bother of new 'gadgets'.
I can produce wonderous time saving trees and links and power copies.
Would the dinosuaur understand it, ? No.
That would be my fault then.
However, I have to work to the ability of the lowest common denominator in my client's office. The 15 years on V4 dinosaur who doesn't want the bother of new 'gadgets'.
I can produce wonderous time saving trees and links and power copies.
Would the dinosuaur understand it, ? No.
That would be my fault then.
Back to the mirroring question. We design Tail lamp for trucks and we have to mirror 99% of the parts from right hand to left hand. The parts that don't mirror are the holes that the bulbs fit into. We design using one side of the vehicle and when we are ready to prototype the parts we mirror (CATIA V4) the opposite side and added the appropriate locking socket hole. If CATIA V5 can't mirror -CATIA V5 has introduced a problem. Do we model up to a level and stop - copy the file to Left hand and finishe design? Does any one have some advise. thanks texaspete
Texaspete...
I've never done tail lamps, but I think you have a good solution: model common geometry, and then mirror and add unique features. I'd put the common geometry in one CATpart, and then link it into the right and left parts with one being symmetry'd.
But, this assumes you can easily store the data in your database (do you use PLM?), and it doesn't cause problems with downstream applications, like analysis and tooling.
...Jack
I've never done tail lamps, but I think you have a good solution: model common geometry, and then mirror and add unique features. I'd put the common geometry in one CATpart, and then link it into the right and left parts with one being symmetry'd.
But, this assumes you can easily store the data in your database (do you use PLM?), and it doesn't cause problems with downstream applications, like analysis and tooling.
...Jack
Jack's method is exactly what I would recommend as well. This way, if you need to make changes that effect both parts, you can make htose changes to the common part. if the changes effect only one or the other, you can change it in one of the child parts.
PLM can help you manage these types of links, however they will work in the file system as well. You may have to create some parts that don't belong in the BOM, but that shouldn't stop you - there are plenty of parts we end up creating in V5 that don't beong in the BOM but are necessary to get CATIA to work most efficiently (just as there are plenty of parts in the BOM that we don't model in CATIA).
PLM can help you manage these types of links, however they will work in the file system as well. You may have to create some parts that don't belong in the BOM, but that shouldn't stop you - there are plenty of parts we end up creating in V5 that don't beong in the BOM but are necessary to get CATIA to work most efficiently (just as there are plenty of parts in the BOM that we don't model in CATIA).
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Helpful tip
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Helpful tip