Todrianth
Civil/Environmental
- Mar 17, 2014
- 9
Hi,
I have a question regarding the energy use index/intensity (EUI) calculation. It is known that it represents the annual energy use divided by the gross floor area but I am skeptical about what that floor area represents. In all examples I've seen calculations of the index, the buildings were simple floor 1, floor 2, ... floor x buildings with nothing special.
But what if we have terraces, those are not heated so why should they be included? Also subterranean parking, those are usually kept just above 10 C, so why should that be included as 21 C places? It seems that the resulting EUI can be highly manipulated in benchmarks by adding or excluding these surfaces.
So what do you think is best practice to this ? I have a building that has exterior terraces and subterranean parking. If I include these surfaces in my EUI calc then consumption is just slightly above good practice (accoding to CIBSE), but if I include these then my building cons. leaps to just above typical practice which is a huge lot, like 40%.
Thanks!
I have a question regarding the energy use index/intensity (EUI) calculation. It is known that it represents the annual energy use divided by the gross floor area but I am skeptical about what that floor area represents. In all examples I've seen calculations of the index, the buildings were simple floor 1, floor 2, ... floor x buildings with nothing special.
But what if we have terraces, those are not heated so why should they be included? Also subterranean parking, those are usually kept just above 10 C, so why should that be included as 21 C places? It seems that the resulting EUI can be highly manipulated in benchmarks by adding or excluding these surfaces.
So what do you think is best practice to this ? I have a building that has exterior terraces and subterranean parking. If I include these surfaces in my EUI calc then consumption is just slightly above good practice (accoding to CIBSE), but if I include these then my building cons. leaps to just above typical practice which is a huge lot, like 40%.
Thanks!