Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Modeling releases in connection between walls and floors 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

EKnivel

Structural
Jun 18, 2014
2
PT
Hello fellow engineers.

I'm modeling a building with resisting masonry walls, some of them with large tickness. The floors are in concrete (with precast beams), most of them with unidirectional behaviour.

I'm using them to apply floor loads and also to in some way connect the other elements. However, I don't want their flexure curvature to influence the behaviour of the masonry walls, since they are only supported in them (pinned), and so isn't a rigid connection. I'm using shell elements for both the walls and the floors.

Is there a way to implement a release in shells like the "Assign-Frame-Releases/Partial Fixity" regarding frame elements? I was thinking of creating a boundary with small shell elements in the slab, in which I would greatly reduce bending stiffness. Is there any other way to do this that you know of?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

you might also try changing the stiffness modifiers of the bending directions of shell elements to a tiny number like .001 in order to simulate a pinned connection. You can do that when you define an area element or by selecting area shell elements and Assign>Area>Area stiffness modifiers
 
Thanks for the help SteeliestFire55, i'm going to try that solutions and see how it goes.

@stressed: Yeah, that was more or less what I was thinking to do, and use Edge Constraints to connect the small shell elements to the others, since the nodes don't coincide. However, I would like to know if there were other options besides that one...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top