HPM3
Mechanical
- Dec 11, 2012
- 8
Hello,
I have two nozzle openings in a torispherical head. Both 3.94" ID, centers spaced 6.5" apart. If I consider these openings individually, there is adequate strength in the shell, nozzle & welds, that no additional reinforcement is required. I think I understand the rules of UG-42a regarding these openings if I was using an actual re-pad, but I'm not clear on what to do when there's already enough strength in the nozzle, shell & welds. The "limits of reinforcement" of these openings overlap but since there is no repad or additional reinforcing element for the individual openings, does it matter? If the combined reinforcement areas in the shell, nozzle & weld, for both fittings is greater than the sum of the areas required for each opening - am I good to go with no additional reinforcement?
Thanks for your help.
HPM
I have two nozzle openings in a torispherical head. Both 3.94" ID, centers spaced 6.5" apart. If I consider these openings individually, there is adequate strength in the shell, nozzle & welds, that no additional reinforcement is required. I think I understand the rules of UG-42a regarding these openings if I was using an actual re-pad, but I'm not clear on what to do when there's already enough strength in the nozzle, shell & welds. The "limits of reinforcement" of these openings overlap but since there is no repad or additional reinforcing element for the individual openings, does it matter? If the combined reinforcement areas in the shell, nozzle & weld, for both fittings is greater than the sum of the areas required for each opening - am I good to go with no additional reinforcement?
Thanks for your help.
HPM