Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

My french drain in progress: will it work? 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

barasingha

Agricultural
Sep 26, 2015
8
After above average rain last winter the site of my future home seeped for months. The site is carved into a hillside of highly decomposed limestone/shale/mudstone/etc. Basically a yellow/gray clay bed with caliche/adobe layers above.

The seep stopped this summer and I am now trying to beat the fall rains with a plan of attack.

First: Dig a trench along the cut all the way to competent stone and bring the trench to daylight on both ends.
image1_odpfck.jpg


Second: Sand was put into the trench to level the bottom and allow for a 1/8" per foot drop out both ends. Sand depth varied from 6 to 12". A 4" perferated drain pipe was centered along the bottom of the trench and the sand was flooded to aid in compaction. sand was placed along the sides of the pipe and compacted with a size 12 boot.
image2_ygggop.jpg


Third: 6" sdr-35 will be placed further up in the trench for surface drainage with a slope of 1/4" per foot. Two separate pipes, one flowing each way.
image3_rxapru.jpg


I am between steps 2 and 3 now and have stopped for football.

As the thread title asks: will it work?

Barasingha
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You have a good start. Backfill with permeable material, and put a couple of clean outs at the3 high point, one to each direction.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


 
Wow someone doing it right. The sand filter is something many don't understand and, instead use open graded rock, figuring those open voids will carry water. As you have figured out those open graded stone "drains' also carry mud. The only question I have is what hole size for pipe perforations? Too large and maybe loss of too much sand into the pipe. However a coarse graded sand, such as concrete fine aggregate will bridge pretty well. ASTM-C-33
 
I usually suggest either a filter fabric 'sock' around the perforated pipe (assuming the perfs are large enough to allow sand entry) or solid pipe is slotted with a saw. Personally, I prefer using a hack saw, placing the slots on 3 sides of the pipe.
"compacted with a size 12 boot" - knobby or smooth sole?
Be sure to compact your foundation backfill, with special care between the foundation and your drain.
 
msquared48 said:
Backfill with permeable material, and put a couple of clean outs at the3 high point, one to each direction.

The complete trench will be filled to the surface with the sand. The high point is at a 90^ turn in the drain--the only hard turn--and I wanted to have a "cross" fitting with a clean out each way but the supply house did not have a 4" cross so clean outs were omitted.

oldestguy said:
The only question I have is what hole size for pipe perforations? Too large and maybe loss of too much sand into the pipe. However a coarse graded sand, such as concrete fine aggregate will bridge pretty well. ASTM-C-33

The perforations are 1/2" in size and all sand is sourced from a river and meets ASTM C-33 spec. The perfs are located at 7 and 5 O'Clock. Why should hole size matter if they're at the bottom of the pipe? I feel like even a half pipe would work well as long as the wall thickness is supported by the fill without settling or washing out from moving water. If I assume the sand pours into the pipe like an hour glass wouldn't the pipe still be empty above a line from 5 to 7 O'clock? The water can only enter the pipe as fast it can filter through the sand X the area of the holes; with or without sand in the bottom of the pipe. These conclusions/presumptions are based on nothing but the countless hours I spent thinking while shoveling sand so please correct me if I'm wrong.

emmgjld said:
knobby or smooth sole?

Compaction was accomplished with a smooth sole. While not as good as a sheep's foot boot, smooth soles keep dirt out of the house and the wife off my back.

Thanks for the support so far. I planned it out and feel good about it but after buying and burying the pipe with expensive sand, I couldn't keep little whispers of doubt from questioning the plan--probably also the result of too much shoveling, uh... thinking, no.. shoveling. Thus, my post here for votes of nodding or head shaking,
Barasingha
 
Years ago Armco Steel sold under drain pipe with holes in the lower quarter. These were 5/16" as I recall. I ran a two year research study (sponsored by Armco) for my Master's using that pipe at five highway water problem sites. I never noticed any sand in the pipes. Since then when "working", for house footing drains and jobs like this one, the slotted pipe was used, slots all the way around and as early jobs with Armco pipes. Minor sand loss noted. Of the filtered with sand under-drains I know about (since about 1958), I don't recall any failing or that the clean outs were ever needed. I know of none with 1/2" holes, but that is not something I'd get worried about.

For the 1/2 inch holes as noted and for seepage flows from something other than clean gravel spring-fed seams, I suspect no problem.
 
Oldestguy:

I have unsuccessfully tried to find the study about concrete sand being a good filter by the Corp of Engineers in 30's. Have any leads for me?

Barasingha
 
emmgjld:

To get serious about compaction for a minute, I would like to explain myself.

I used this bulletin as my guide:
My calculations resulted in a 6.5-8.5% deflection at the deepest point of my trench (7ft), a highway live load rating and no compaction of fill. Because it states that 7.5% deflection is the recommended limit for drain pipes, I determined my boot would keep me below the threshold.

Would you be so kind as to explain your comment/concern about compaction of fill between the foundation and trench?

Barasingha
 
Would you be so kind as to explain your comment/concern about compaction of fill between the foundation and trench?

To provide a 'semi-dam' between the water source & the foundation. Assuming the drain works, for the life of the foundation, the issue may be moot. If anything goes wrong, you have created a simple barrier as a backup.
Actually, If possible, I prefer constructing drains as the last resort & hope they never see water. Part of that is problems in a semi-arid to arid environment.
 
beej67 said:
Does it have positive drainage?

The site is dual sloped, down hill and parallel to the hill. The perf pipes are sloped for their entire length 1/8" per foot. The 6" drain tiles are sloped 1/4" per foot along their entire length. There are two exits to the trench and a single high point located at a 90^ turn in the trench. The 4" perf pipe is continuous--exits both ends--with a high point located at the 90^ turn. The 6" pipe is discontinuous; one 6" pipe runs along the future home site for roof drainage and another runs along the future garage site for the same purpose, they each drain out of their own end of the trench. At the ends of the trench the perf and 6" pipe exit to daylight at the same level but the 6" rises more upon entering the trench. I have concrete pipe that will be used at the daylight exits to prevent sun rot and traffic damage.

emmgjld said:
To provide a 'semi-dam' between the water source & the foundation.

Thanks for the explanation. I plan to use the undisturbed clay bed to provide the semi-dam. The foundation excavation will vary from 5-15' away from the trench. I will take care to compact around conduits penetrating the semi-dam, although they will be much shallower than the trench. I plan to install another 4" perf around the foundation with another 6" drain tile for shedding the other half of the roofs water, these pipes exit straight off the hill (the other side of the house from the trench).

Oldestguy:
Thank you for the resources.

Barasingha
 
OG, I was reading some papers about filters in dams (Terzaghi-1940 and Sherard-1984). Maybe filter criteria for earth dams can be applicable for these cases?
 
I perhaps didn't so state, but here is my view and that of many. Concrete sand (ASTM-C33)is a great all-'round filter for most soils. When it comes to filtering cohesive clays it may not quite fit the general rules for filters. However, that material does not erode noticeably. My experience shows no problems in these cases with concrete sand as the filter. On the contrary, I have seen many failures where open graded gravel is the "filter". The worst ones are where that fails as perimeter footing drains the first year after construction.
 
I just ran across I had scanned for another purpose. Comes from an old version of NAVAC DM-7

The basic rules show up at the bottom.

img007_v72dzi.jpg
 
oldestguy said:
The basic rules show up at the bottom.

Does this mean that concrete sand is good for perforations up to 2" in size?

Update: I have both pipes buried and most of the trench filled. I am out of sand and have 26 more tons on the way. I have used 195 tons so far.

Barasingha
 
You are looking at particle size plots and a graded material with its 15 percent size at about 1/4". Thus the void spaces are likely about 1/5th of the 15 percent grain size.

One common way to save money with filters is to use the most correct grain sizes near the perforated pipe and then fill the rest of the trench with a clean sand, which is more permeable than the nearby trench walls. However, top off the backfill with clays to keep the surface water out of the trench. No point in collecting that if you can make it run off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor