CaliEng
Structural
- Feb 14, 2020
- 49
Referring to an old closed thread here:
Interesting N_h isnt not explicity covered in an equation, though its in list of Notaiton (E.2.2)
In the previous thread @JStephen states "It's the hydrostatic stress times the thickness. .. Nh= 2.6(H-1)DG". But thickness is not in that formula. Would it rather be Nh=2.6(H-1)DGt?
On the contrary @jcoots assumed it might be "(Head Press/shell thk.)" which seems to jive more with the equation JStephen was refering to.
Thanks for the clarification!
ich actually seems to align more with the equation
Interesting N_h isnt not explicity covered in an equation, though its in list of Notaiton (E.2.2)
In the previous thread @JStephen states "It's the hydrostatic stress times the thickness. .. Nh= 2.6(H-1)DG". But thickness is not in that formula. Would it rather be Nh=2.6(H-1)DGt?
On the contrary @jcoots assumed it might be "(Head Press/shell thk.)" which seems to jive more with the equation JStephen was refering to.
Thanks for the clarification!