demser
Chemical
- Jun 25, 2012
- 14
Dear all
with the new combined standard NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-2002, several changes had been introduced (with respect to previous MR 0175 versions), still present in the most recent version of 2015.
HIC (Hydrogen Induced Cracking) is among the new features, and described in Clause 8 of ISO 15156-2.
Clause 8 states that HIC shall be considered as a potential issue even in case of "trace amounts of H2S". No threshold, and - from my point of view - the magical H2S partial pressure of 0.05 psi / 0,3 kPa is irrelevant for HIC assessment: either there is H2S (even in trace amounts) or there is none.
On the other hand, HIC as potential issue is mentioned in the context of SSC (Clause 7.1.2). This implies a relationship between the applicability of SSC (Clause 7.1.2: p(H2S) > 0,3 kPa) and HIC. Whereas Clause 8 implies strict independence.
And from my background a Chemists, I'd rate Clause 8 as more reasonable.
The background is gas sweetening of natural gas of 1,3 mbar p(H2S), less than 50% of the magical 0,3 kPa.
I'd like to ask you on advice:
? How do you implement ISO 15156, and HIC assessment in particular?
? What are your experiences?
? what carbon steel grades do you apply for HIC service?
Thank you very much,
Reinhard
with the new combined standard NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-2002, several changes had been introduced (with respect to previous MR 0175 versions), still present in the most recent version of 2015.
HIC (Hydrogen Induced Cracking) is among the new features, and described in Clause 8 of ISO 15156-2.
Clause 8 states that HIC shall be considered as a potential issue even in case of "trace amounts of H2S". No threshold, and - from my point of view - the magical H2S partial pressure of 0.05 psi / 0,3 kPa is irrelevant for HIC assessment: either there is H2S (even in trace amounts) or there is none.
On the other hand, HIC as potential issue is mentioned in the context of SSC (Clause 7.1.2). This implies a relationship between the applicability of SSC (Clause 7.1.2: p(H2S) > 0,3 kPa) and HIC. Whereas Clause 8 implies strict independence.
And from my background a Chemists, I'd rate Clause 8 as more reasonable.
The background is gas sweetening of natural gas of 1,3 mbar p(H2S), less than 50% of the magical 0,3 kPa.
I'd like to ask you on advice:
? How do you implement ISO 15156, and HIC assessment in particular?
? What are your experiences?
? what carbon steel grades do you apply for HIC service?
Thank you very much,
Reinhard