Good point David. This is an interesting question! Because 30 MMBtu/hr is a very large heat load for non-fired heater service. I could have made this more clear in subject title. I will keep this in mind for future – thanks.
The reason for heating the natural gas is to keep it from condensing (it contains ethane, propane, butane). We are reluctant to use a fired heater because all this equipment will be on board a ship, and we prefer to avoid complexity & minimize plot space for ship-board equipment. Also spare electrical capacity is available when ship is docked (which is when the natural gas is being loaded, and requires heating). This is a very front end conceptual / feasibility study for a novel process.
I’m currently favouring 3 to 4 off-the-shelf water bath heaters for the service. They don’t come big enough for this service hence why we’d need several. I am interested in any comments & suggestions from other engineers re water bath heaters or other type of equipment. We don’t have much steam or hot glycol available – if using shell & tube exchanger we’d have to add steam or glycol system which seems to me would add a lot more complexity than water bath heaters, or fired heater.