RoarkS
Mechanical
- Jul 10, 2009
- 250
Howdy, my google kungfu has failed me. I have an old (late 1930's) print for a sand cast engine component that calls out Material: Alcoa 142-t63/Bohn Y-2 Heat treat:30000 min tensile, 2-3% elongation, appx 70 brinell.
I tried an email to Alcoa ingot division but it has been the better part of a month.
Anyway I need to be able to make this part. I'm guessing A356 will be more than fine... but I'm not 100% sure. I can't imagine that an outdated alloy from 1938 would have better properties.
Closest thing I have been able to find is out of my ASM Metals Handbook 1939 edition that lists Alcoa No.142-T61 and T571 and Ingot No.142... lists it as an Al-Cu-Ni-Mg alloy.
Anyway when it comes down to it for PMA, I have a licensing agreement with the type certificate holder, with the original blueprints... but am worried that I can’t claim identicality because of the change of alloy.
If anyone has any thoughts either on the alloy itself for making me feel better about Identicality due to licensing I would love to hear about it.
I tried an email to Alcoa ingot division but it has been the better part of a month.
Anyway I need to be able to make this part. I'm guessing A356 will be more than fine... but I'm not 100% sure. I can't imagine that an outdated alloy from 1938 would have better properties.
Closest thing I have been able to find is out of my ASM Metals Handbook 1939 edition that lists Alcoa No.142-T61 and T571 and Ingot No.142... lists it as an Al-Cu-Ni-Mg alloy.
Anyway when it comes down to it for PMA, I have a licensing agreement with the type certificate holder, with the original blueprints... but am worried that I can’t claim identicality because of the change of alloy.
If anyone has any thoughts either on the alloy itself for making me feel better about Identicality due to licensing I would love to hear about it.