ContractorDave
Mechanical
- Jan 16, 2007
- 364
Scenario:
A residential structure is designed as a 3 family dwelling that is basically 3 prefabbed and pre-sprinklered structures that are assembled on site one on top of the other. The local bylaws state "All two family dwellings and multiple family dwellings shall be sprinklered". (That's all it says). NFPA would require this to be a 13R installation. The city bylaw department has decided to relax the bylaw and permit a 13D installation.
Plausible future scenario:
The building burns down and lives are lost. Though the sprinkler contractor has documentation that a 13D installation was permissible by the cities bylaw enforcement division, it can be argued that they are not the experts in the matter, and that if a sprinkler system was installed, it should have been installed to 13R.
This is happening.
Thoughts?
A residential structure is designed as a 3 family dwelling that is basically 3 prefabbed and pre-sprinklered structures that are assembled on site one on top of the other. The local bylaws state "All two family dwellings and multiple family dwellings shall be sprinklered". (That's all it says). NFPA would require this to be a 13R installation. The city bylaw department has decided to relax the bylaw and permit a 13D installation.
Plausible future scenario:
The building burns down and lives are lost. Though the sprinkler contractor has documentation that a 13D installation was permissible by the cities bylaw enforcement division, it can be argued that they are not the experts in the matter, and that if a sprinkler system was installed, it should have been installed to 13R.
This is happening.
Thoughts?