Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Non-Linear Pushover Analysis

Status
Not open for further replies.

thewhitehair

Structural
Oct 11, 2013
5
Hi,

Can someone please clarify some things for me. I am new to sap0000 and trying to figure out how to work with non linear analysis. For a simple introduction I just made a cantilever beam with a load at the tip. I defined a time-history function with a load that should start in the elastic range and end in the plastic range for the section and material I used.

I defined a frame hinge in at the base of the beam in order to get the plastic deformation in the right place.

My question is about what load case I should use. When I watch the CSI tutorials on youtube they use an acceleration in a non linear static analysis but the results I get for that dont make any sense. So I used the time history function I defined and got results that make some sense, the beam yields but not at the Fy=50 ksi (I used A992 steel).

Basically I just want someone to tell me how to get a cantilevered beam to behave non-linearly in the way calculate it should.

Thank you
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Could you please clarify,where is this video and what accelaeration are you talking about?

If you refer to "Accel" as a load type, in nonlinear load case window, then this is defined to tell the program that the lateral load will be incremental at say, 'UX' direction with a scale factor of either 1 or -1 (so that it will result to positive or negative displacements).
 
Yes this is how you do it for the lateral load.It is just what I wrote before.Not a "true aceleration".

What exactly doesn't make sense in the results you mentioned in the first post? Because I believe there is some confusion of static nonlinear with transient nonlinear analysis.
 
Thank you for getting back to me. I will attach my model file on Monday and maybe you can explain to me what I am doing wrong.

 
Here is the file. Like I stated before I used a cantilever beam and now I have applied the accel load in the load case window. The reason I dont think the results make sense is that a hinge is not formed and the deflection of the tip is linear. It should be non linear to reflect the beam yielding.
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=0e48d1c1-9c1b-45f8-8b06-a81ff6a04da4&file=Test.sdb
Are you sure this is the right file?
-There are no frame hinges in this one (define->section properties->hinge properties...)
-One of your materials has a stress-strain curve to behave as tottaly elastic
-There is no nonlinear static analysis case but a direct integration one.The accel is the "Load Type" in a "Static Nonlinear" analysis,not in transient analysis.Pushover is a static analysis.

The video example is very clear on that.I suggest you perform it step by step,and then attempt to do pushover on your file.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor