Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Non-structural access panels on wings or fuselages fasteners pitch

Status
Not open for further replies.

eVTOL_fan

Aerospace
Jun 23, 2021
4
Hello all,

I was wondering if there is a standard best practice for the fasteners spacing when designing non-structural composites removable access panels on wings or fuselages (non-pressurized) normally using camlocks or nut plates. I have in mind that this should be bigger than the one used on primary structure (5D-6D)

I also think we want to minimize the number of fasteners so the mechanic wont spend too much time removing/installing the access panel.

Panels I'm designing are oval shaped and pretty small. Size is 8"x7". I'm using NAS1102-8V csk fasteners with FORCETEC nutplates. Also planning to use liquid gasket to seal the panel to skin joint.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I don't have my NAS books with me, but NAS1102 are pretty small, no? 3/16" is normally the smallest screw, and most common with tool kits, and you can get away with a 2" pitch.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
 
eVTOL_fan… a few thoughts on this subject...

Be careful about the term 'non-structural'. In military aircraft these panels are considered 'lightly loaded, secondary-structure access doors/panels'.

IF these were truly non-structural, then polyethylene film could be taped-over the opening to keep-out the sun, mud and rain.

Also, be very careful about fastener sizes... 3/16 Dia fasteners with various drive mechanisms are considered 'mandatory'... since mechanics have a unique-way of damaging smaller diameter [delicate] removable parts... over many maintenance cycles... no matter-how careful they are. And these are always a pain to replace or repair the door edges/holes from scratches/gouges, nicks, tears etc.

Also... NEVER directly attach these type panels to primary/critical structure. These should always attach to an intermediary structural element to ensure that panel/fastening damage/failures CANNOT-EVER-NEVER transmit damage to the primary structure.

IF weight saving is a premium, then perhaps the new high-tech 'plasteners' [plastic fasteners] should be considered.

Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]
 
Is it a wet wing? If so, seal integrity will be a major factor in determining fastener pitch.
Have a look Niu, I recall there is some guidance on wing access panel design.
 
Thank you guys for the great answers, very helpful. Ng2020 isn't a wet wing, it's an electric aircraft.
 
WKTaylor,

Interesting those plasteners, do you have any reference, specs, manufacturer etc.?

Thank you
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor