Spoonful
Mechanical
- Oct 18, 2008
- 175
Hi All,
Here I have got a question; it might be stupid question or not an issue at all.
Nozzle opening on the vessel, Can the nozzle be set on rather than set in?
We have always used nozzle to be set in. The reason is that not only we can have a full penetration weld but also that the weld the across the whole thickness of the shell, If we use nozzle to be set on, we can still have a full penetration weld, but the entire weld would be only on the surface of the shell, if there is any lamination in the shell. The whole weld or the nozzle could tear off at the lamination.
The reason of my concerning is, sometime we need to consider using weldolet instead of con pads. But weldolet are normally set on. Dose the PV code state anything in regarding with these nozzle Set on or Set in issue? AS1210 dose allow to use set on nozzle attachment method. Dose ASME had anything to say about this? Or am I just over concerned?
Could anyone give some hints, Thanks in advance.
Here I have got a question; it might be stupid question or not an issue at all.
Nozzle opening on the vessel, Can the nozzle be set on rather than set in?
We have always used nozzle to be set in. The reason is that not only we can have a full penetration weld but also that the weld the across the whole thickness of the shell, If we use nozzle to be set on, we can still have a full penetration weld, but the entire weld would be only on the surface of the shell, if there is any lamination in the shell. The whole weld or the nozzle could tear off at the lamination.
The reason of my concerning is, sometime we need to consider using weldolet instead of con pads. But weldolet are normally set on. Dose the PV code state anything in regarding with these nozzle Set on or Set in issue? AS1210 dose allow to use set on nozzle attachment method. Dose ASME had anything to say about this? Or am I just over concerned?
Could anyone give some hints, Thanks in advance.