kennywiley
New member
- Jul 13, 2010
- 6
Background:
Working in NX6.0.5.3 MP3
Our previous part fams were built on mating conditions. I am new to the role and was asked to lead up the NX6 implementaiton to our site(serves app. 400 daily NX users). NX6 was deployed sucessfuly and we have been using it since June. I am now trying to capture items that slipped through as well as plan for the future with what I saw at the regional PLM conference.
I applaud the Reuse library and have been working as one of my main goals to populate this with everything that I can think of based off of our site standards and commonly used items. But in the conversion of our part fams, I am having an issue updating some of the assy constraints.
Questions:
1)When using a simple item such as a NAS623 screw(Touch and Align constraint), is there a way to force the remembrance of the axial geometry "Infer Center/Axis" during installation so that users do not have to select the dropdown each time or get the component placed tangent to the hole and not completely aligned?
2)Since I could not get this easily working through multiple attempts, I tried to use the concentric and touch align constraints when rebuilding my part fams. At this point, when both constraints are present, it says that I am overconstrianed. Below are my information windows on the constraints. Am I not properly understanding how the concentric constriant should function with others or do I have an issue with my model that does not allow me to select the cylindrical face of the shank of the fastener?
Concentric Constriant Information
Default Name Touch (NAS623, KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-)
Constraint type Touch
Alignment type Contra Align
Expression None
Suppressed False
Status Over constrained
Reference 1 NAS623
Geometry name MATING.MATE1
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
Reference 2 KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
Name Touch (NAS623, KDW-ASSY_CONSTR
Owning part KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-
Layer 1
Type Assembly Constraint
Color 186 (Red)
Font SOLID
Width Thin
Modified Version 19 05 Nov 2010 10:23 (by user wileykd)
Created Version 19 05 Nov 2010 10:23 (by user wileykd)
Touch Constraint Information
Default Name Touch (NAS623, KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-)
Constraint type Touch
Alignment type Contra Align
Expression None
Suppressed False
Status Over constrained
Reference 1 NAS623
Geometry name MATING.MATE1
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
Reference 2 KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
@JohnBaker
I enjoyed and learned some cool stuff about NX7.5 at the recent Houston conference that I want to implement here, but its just me pushing the envelope right now!(with little to no money inside of course)
Thanks all
Kenny
Working in NX6.0.5.3 MP3
Our previous part fams were built on mating conditions. I am new to the role and was asked to lead up the NX6 implementaiton to our site(serves app. 400 daily NX users). NX6 was deployed sucessfuly and we have been using it since June. I am now trying to capture items that slipped through as well as plan for the future with what I saw at the regional PLM conference.
I applaud the Reuse library and have been working as one of my main goals to populate this with everything that I can think of based off of our site standards and commonly used items. But in the conversion of our part fams, I am having an issue updating some of the assy constraints.
Questions:
1)When using a simple item such as a NAS623 screw(Touch and Align constraint), is there a way to force the remembrance of the axial geometry "Infer Center/Axis" during installation so that users do not have to select the dropdown each time or get the component placed tangent to the hole and not completely aligned?
2)Since I could not get this easily working through multiple attempts, I tried to use the concentric and touch align constraints when rebuilding my part fams. At this point, when both constraints are present, it says that I am overconstrianed. Below are my information windows on the constraints. Am I not properly understanding how the concentric constriant should function with others or do I have an issue with my model that does not allow me to select the cylindrical face of the shank of the fastener?
Concentric Constriant Information
Default Name Touch (NAS623, KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-)
Constraint type Touch
Alignment type Contra Align
Expression None
Suppressed False
Status Over constrained
Reference 1 NAS623
Geometry name MATING.MATE1
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
Reference 2 KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
Name Touch (NAS623, KDW-ASSY_CONSTR
Owning part KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-
Layer 1
Type Assembly Constraint
Color 186 (Red)
Font SOLID
Width Thin
Modified Version 19 05 Nov 2010 10:23 (by user wileykd)
Created Version 19 05 Nov 2010 10:23 (by user wileykd)
Touch Constraint Information
Default Name Touch (NAS623, KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-)
Constraint type Touch
Alignment type Contra Align
Expression None
Suppressed False
Status Over constrained
Reference 1 NAS623
Geometry name MATING.MATE1
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
Reference 2 KDW-ASSY_CONSTRIANTS/-
Geometry type Face
Solved as Plane
@JohnBaker
I enjoyed and learned some cool stuff about NX7.5 at the recent Houston conference that I want to implement here, but its just me pushing the envelope right now!(with little to no money inside of course)
Thanks all
Kenny