jibebuoy
Structural
- Dec 17, 2007
- 5
I have a question regarding the use of bonded or unbonded tendon equations for flexural strength (ref: ACI 318-05, section 18.7.2). I am wondering if a structure's rigidity plays into whether or not one can use the bonded equation (18-3) or not.
My structure is a wall that is built just downstream of a dam spillway and is founded on the river bottom which is basalt. The wall is about 40' tall, 10' wide and over 800' long. I am using PT tendon rock anchors to provide stability as well as strength to resist the imposed hydraulic loads that have a head differential of about 35' on either side of the wall (there is spill on one side of the wall but not the other). The defelction at the top of the wall is only about 1/32". This situation is very similar to a PT cantilevered floor slab but on a greater scale.
I am wondering if the bonded tendon equation for flexural strength (18-3) requires a certain amount of delfelction in order for you to realize the greater strength it provides as opposed to the unbonded equation, (18-4/5).
My structure is a wall that is built just downstream of a dam spillway and is founded on the river bottom which is basalt. The wall is about 40' tall, 10' wide and over 800' long. I am using PT tendon rock anchors to provide stability as well as strength to resist the imposed hydraulic loads that have a head differential of about 35' on either side of the wall (there is spill on one side of the wall but not the other). The defelction at the top of the wall is only about 1/32". This situation is very similar to a PT cantilevered floor slab but on a greater scale.
I am wondering if the bonded tendon equation for flexural strength (18-3) requires a certain amount of delfelction in order for you to realize the greater strength it provides as opposed to the unbonded equation, (18-4/5).