BigJohn1
Electrical
- May 24, 2003
- 57
I can't see any rhyme or reason for what will cause partial discharge in medium voltage cabling systems:
I have noticed that a lot of molded splice and termination products have very significant internal gaps between the conductor and the molding as part of their design. These seem to work fine for years with no serious partial discharge.
Yet, when hand-taped splices and terms are put on a tremendous amount of effort is put into excluding even the smallest voids or spaces, for fear of destructive partial discharge.
What is the difference here? Why is PD not as much of a problem with molded products?
Further, I have seen 35kV elbows where PD was happening very seriously but after looking at dozens of identical installations there again seemed to be no rhyme or reason behind where it was occurring (sometimes near air spaces in the kit, sometimes not, some with zero evidence of PD, some almost completely destroyed).
Why are there "different rules" for molded products than tape for excluding partial discharge?
I have noticed that a lot of molded splice and termination products have very significant internal gaps between the conductor and the molding as part of their design. These seem to work fine for years with no serious partial discharge.
Yet, when hand-taped splices and terms are put on a tremendous amount of effort is put into excluding even the smallest voids or spaces, for fear of destructive partial discharge.
What is the difference here? Why is PD not as much of a problem with molded products?
Further, I have seen 35kV elbows where PD was happening very seriously but after looking at dozens of identical installations there again seemed to be no rhyme or reason behind where it was occurring (sometimes near air spaces in the kit, sometimes not, some with zero evidence of PD, some almost completely destroyed).
Why are there "different rules" for molded products than tape for excluding partial discharge?