Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
Parts list from a multi-body part 2
- Thread starter Lupen
- Start date
JohnRBaker
Mechanical
The Parts List function is designed to work with Components of an Assembly. It was never intended to work with multiple solid bodies inside a single part file as that's not considered an Assembly.
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
-
1
- #3
It works best with actual components, as John has indicated. However, you should be able to get it to work for solids in a file, refer to ewh's comment in thread561-365703.
www.nxjournaling.com
www.nxjournaling.com
-
1
- #4
It stuck with me because it is a good, but non-obvious solution to what is probably a fairly common use case.
If the solution works for you, be sure to star ewh's post in the linked thread!
www.nxjournaling.com
If the solution works for you, be sure to star ewh's post in the linked thread!
www.nxjournaling.com
- Thread starter
- #6
Thank You all guys.
I know that parts list is soposed to be an assemly function but I really like multi-body parts modeling.
For me, the best way is modeling in a part with more bodys. I dont trust the assembly. You have more csys than an when you do something or move something - everything depends on some parametrics. I know that maybe this is an old fashion approach but I like to make a ''straight forward design'' with parametrics only where I need it.
Thank You ewh, i will try this method. I think this should work.
I will report.
Best regards, L
I know that parts list is soposed to be an assemly function but I really like multi-body parts modeling.
For me, the best way is modeling in a part with more bodys. I dont trust the assembly. You have more csys than an when you do something or move something - everything depends on some parametrics. I know that maybe this is an old fashion approach but I like to make a ''straight forward design'' with parametrics only where I need it.
Thank You ewh, i will try this method. I think this should work.
I will report.
Best regards, L
The type of projects I work on, most of the parts are unique. When starting a new design, I tend to model multiple bodies in a single file then eventually break them out into individual parts using the "create new component" command. This leads to "modeling in assembly space" so that assembly constraints are not necessary. I get the advantages of an assembly (easy parts list, exploded views, arrangements, etc) without the burden of maintaining assembly constraints (though they are handy on occasion).
Keeping all the solids in a single file can be quite confusing and lead to potential problems with the documentation (drawings, revisions, other PDM related stuff).
Whatever route you take, best of luck to you.
www.nxjournaling.com
Keeping all the solids in a single file can be quite confusing and lead to potential problems with the documentation (drawings, revisions, other PDM related stuff).
Whatever route you take, best of luck to you.
www.nxjournaling.com
Interesting, I always recommend the complete opposite to this approach.
Horses for courses!
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3
Horses for courses!
NX 8.5 with TC 8.3
One step that I forgot to add to the previous thread...
Once you have the attributes set on the bodies, you need to edit the levels of the parts list to add the bodies to it (Select/Deselect Subassemblies), then update the list.
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
Once you have the attributes set on the bodies, you need to edit the levels of the parts list to add the bodies to it (Select/Deselect Subassemblies), then update the list.
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
- Thread starter
- #12
Thanks again to everyone.
I am sorry for my late response but I actually got it to work...so thanks
Cowski I have a question about the ''create new component'' command. I tried to do an assembly from a multi-body part with this command but i realised that whan you do that the part rebuilds with errors. Some extrude and Sketches depends obviously with this body. Do I have to remove any parametrics first or export to parasolid (loses parametrics) to be able to do that ?
Thank You,
Best regards, L
I am sorry for my late response but I actually got it to work...so thanks
Cowski I have a question about the ''create new component'' command. I tried to do an assembly from a multi-body part with this command but i realised that whan you do that the part rebuilds with errors. Some extrude and Sketches depends obviously with this body. Do I have to remove any parametrics first or export to parasolid (loses parametrics) to be able to do that ?
Thank You,
Best regards, L
- Status
