Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

PCB Timer

Status
Not open for further replies.

brinkmann27

Electrical
May 9, 2002
33
We make a small PCB which controls a pump. We have an alarm/shutdown circuit which is delayed by one minute during startup. In the past we have used a solid state timer off the board and wire back to it. The coil voltage is 24 VAC and we have a SPST contact on the timer.

Ideally we would like to find a small delay on timer which will mount directly on the PCB. All the units we have found are standard timers using a PCB mounting block. The cost and size of these units are not acceptacle.

If there is a small PCB timer out there we haven't found it. Anyone know where one is?

Thanks in advance.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Perfect app for a small PIC chip, or a 555 timer IC if you're not a programmer type.

Dan - Owner
Footwell%20Animation%20Tiny.gif
 
Yes! If you're going to redo the board anyway, use a PIC. Get someone to do it for you. Won't take long and won't cost much. And you can have it work exactly like you want it too.

With a wee bit of thought, you can probably add a useful feature or two also. If you have adjustments on the present board to set the time, all that can go the way of the Dodo.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.-
 
Agreed. An onboard PIC would cost less than a lot of hardware. You could still put a 555 timer to one-shot mode or something, but...
The PIC12F629 costs less than $2, and the program should take < 2 hours of C code.
The C compiler is free:
and there's a free (trial) C compiler:
microchip.htsoft.com/products/compilers/PICClite.php

There are dev. boards for less than $20, from 3rd-parties and 'officials'

There are also cost-effective alternatives from Atmel and Freescale Nitron family microcontrollers. I don't know 'em well but it worth paying a visit to their sites.

Good luck with the board!
Gonzalo
 
Hiya-

Not to disagree with GonzaloEE. but the 12F629 might be overkill for the product. It is a fine chip with lots of capabilities. I have used the 12F675s a lot. They are the same as the 12F629s with an a/d converter on it.

You might look at the 10F200 series of PICs. These are even cheaper. Don't have much memory nor ram, but they can do the job. They are running about $0.60/chip quantity 100s from Mouser. The 10F220s which have a little more capability (like an A/D) run about the same price.

If you want to go to a micro, then there are all sorts of capabilities that open up to you. A good consultant with a good statement of work might significantly reduce the parts count on the board.

Best of luck!

Cheers,

Rich S.

 
Thanks Richs. Each day there is a new micro with a little more stuff packed inside.
I'm also a happy PIC user for years (honestly, just avoiding a new learning curve and throwing away dev boards, hehe).

Agreed an independent consultant could provide better guidance.

Good luck with the BOM!

Gonzalo
 
Hi GonzaloEE

I too agree on only learning what I need to do the job. The intro to the 10F series was for a client. I typically have about 4 of the PICs that I use off the shelf now. The 10F parts (as mentioned earlier) the 12F675, 16F648 (now) and the 16F877 parts. Will switch to the 16F88X parts in the near future.

Shoot, there is so much overlap on the PIC parts, half the battle is determining what sort of price/overkill you want to deal with!

Since the OP mentioned cost, I'm assuming that he is willing to swap the NRE (non recoverable engineering) costs vs. the number of PCBs he wants to produce over the lifetime of the board.

For ease of use, the 12F629 *IS* easier to program/maintain/upgrade, etc. and is only a few pennies more per part. Almost six of one and a half dozen of the other.

Cheers,

Rich S.
 
Hi Richs

Certainly, I guess each engineer has his/her own 'update rate' or balance between the time spent in learning new technologies, and the time spent gaining further experience with that (s)he already knows.

Also agreed that Microchip (like other vendors) always try to 'bulletproof' their products, so it's almost unavoidable to be paying for a chip with lot of features you will never use.

Seems like 10F200 sounds good for this, as it only have the timer, a watchdog timer, and enough ROM for the needed application. Right to the point.

Regards,
GonzaloEE
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor