Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

PE Exam Cable Practice Problem

Status
Not open for further replies.

swooneyWOODSTRUCT

Structural
Aug 23, 2019
25
Please help me figure out what I am doing wrong in the attached problem. My calc is in the red rectangle. I got the same answer as the solution up until they solved the equilibrium equations at C (the last step). I summed the forces in the y direction instead of the x and got a different answer.

When I sum the forces in the x direction like they did, I get the correct solution. Why the difference? Don't the x and y forces BOTH have to sum to zero?

I assumed I was just making an algebraic mistake so I plugged it into a calculator and I still got the same, wrong answer.

 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=7a1bd330-e0fb-499d-b970-4cec8e79841c&file=help.pdf
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I think your answer of 27.5K for Fbc is correct. If you sum the vertical components of Fab and Fbc, they must sum to 50K. They only sum to 50K if Fbc is 27.5K, not if it's 51.9K.
I still cannot figure out why there is a difference when the different methodologies are used.
 
I couldn't figure it out. I started by calculating all of the forces at the restraints, but then my summation of forces at node B didn't sum to zero.
 
Is not cable BC at a 2/4 slope rather than 1/4? I have not gone through the problem to try and solve it yet, just a quick observation.
 
I solved for the forces at each joint independently, and found the force in Fbc is different depending on which joint it's solved at.
I think that, for the given forces and cable lengths, the cable angles are wrong. Alternatively, either the load at joint B needs to increase, or the load at joint C needs to decrease.
 
Goatenstein,
See my post 15:58 directly preceding yours.
 
dlansdad,
Cable BC is at a 2/8 slope which simplifies to a 1/4 slope.
 
Maybe the system is not in equilibrium in it's current state?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor