rjh63
Mechanical
- Jan 25, 2012
- 4
Hi,
I've been reviewing a design for a deaerator vessel and associated relief stream to be installed at my company. The vessel is designed to EN 13445 which is pretty new to me - our existing vessel population is mostly PD5500 or ASME VIII. I do have a recently purchased copy of EN13445 but I have been looking in vain for any indication within the code of allowable accumulation during a relief event. By contrast, PD 5500 clearly indicates 10% (3.13.2 Capacity of Relief Devices) and ASME VIII div 1 also generally allows (for non-fire cases) 10%, or 16% with multiple valves (UG 125). All I can find in EN 13445 is a reference (in part 3, 5.3.4) that maximum allowable pressure PS shall not be less than the pressure where the relief valve starts to open. It does not reference the pressure when the relief is fully open. Seems an oversight if this is not included somewhere??
Any thought gratefully received - I am for the time being working on the basis that sticking with 10% should be sensible.
Thanks,
Richard
I've been reviewing a design for a deaerator vessel and associated relief stream to be installed at my company. The vessel is designed to EN 13445 which is pretty new to me - our existing vessel population is mostly PD5500 or ASME VIII. I do have a recently purchased copy of EN13445 but I have been looking in vain for any indication within the code of allowable accumulation during a relief event. By contrast, PD 5500 clearly indicates 10% (3.13.2 Capacity of Relief Devices) and ASME VIII div 1 also generally allows (for non-fire cases) 10%, or 16% with multiple valves (UG 125). All I can find in EN 13445 is a reference (in part 3, 5.3.4) that maximum allowable pressure PS shall not be less than the pressure where the relief valve starts to open. It does not reference the pressure when the relief is fully open. Seems an oversight if this is not included somewhere??
Any thought gratefully received - I am for the time being working on the basis that sticking with 10% should be sensible.
Thanks,
Richard