Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pervious Pavement 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

sns777

Civil/Environmental
Jul 15, 2003
19
0
0
US
Can anyone give me information on pervious pavement? Particularly, the costs vs regular asphalt and how it holds up and any maintanence issues. The application would be for commercial parking lots and/or driveways. The reason to use it would be to increase stormwater infiltration.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Avoid pervious pavement if you have:

1. "plastic" clay soils (generally, PI > 35),
2. distinct wet and dry seasons, with droughts possible, and
3. a base course that's less than 10 or 12 inches thick.

You may also want to avoid this pavement type where freeze/thaw is a problem. (That's a guess - anyone with relevant experience want to chime in?)

Pervious pavements deteriorate very quickly under these conditions; you would be better off with gravel (or base alone.) And I would forget about pervious pavements in service drives - unless you plan to use a high strength paver system and a very thick, strong base.

[pacman]

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
 
Found a monitoring study from UW recently that addresses long term performance issues, here is the link (Benjamin O. Brattebo and Derek B. Booth, 2003):


Here is the Abstract
This study examined the long-term effectiveness of permeable pavement as an alternative
to traditional impervious asphalt pavement in a parking area. Four commercially
available permeable pavement systems were evaluated after six years of daily parking
usage for structural durability, ability to infiltrate precipitation, and impacts on infiltrate
water quality. All four permeable pavement systems showed no major signs of wear.
Virtually all rainwater infiltrated through the permeable pavements, with almost no
surface runoff. The infiltrated water had significantly lower levels of copper and zinc
than the direct surface runoff from the asphalt area. Motor oil was detected in 89% of
samples from the asphalt runoff but not in any water sample infiltrated through the
permeable pavement. Neither lead nor diesel fuel were detected in any sample. Infiltrate
measured five years earlier displayed significantly higher concentrations of zinc and
significantly lower concentrations of copper and lead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top