Civengine
Civil/Environmental
- Apr 11, 2003
- 2
I work for a state parks system. The system has little money since we need to be self supporting. And the bosses hate anything that looks "engineered."
I have a 600' slope failure along a shoreline I need to deal with. About a year ago, the shoreline was armored. Pre-armor photos clearly show existing slope failures that look an awful lot like translational failures. The current failures also show signs of sliding along a plane instead of rotating into the lake. I haven't done a subsurface examination yet nor surveyed the lake bottom to see what is down there.
In the past for smaller slope failures, we have cut off the top of the slide and installed cantilevered retaining walls. They work (if you use deadmen- but that's another story ;-)), but they're ugly.
I have considered pinning the slope with soldier piles- either steel or wood.
My questions- Can I approach the design as a cantilevered wall using soil arching between piles? I am concerned because of long-term soil deformation.
Where should the base of my wall be considered to be? At the slide interface?
I have a 600' slope failure along a shoreline I need to deal with. About a year ago, the shoreline was armored. Pre-armor photos clearly show existing slope failures that look an awful lot like translational failures. The current failures also show signs of sliding along a plane instead of rotating into the lake. I haven't done a subsurface examination yet nor surveyed the lake bottom to see what is down there.
In the past for smaller slope failures, we have cut off the top of the slide and installed cantilevered retaining walls. They work (if you use deadmen- but that's another story ;-)), but they're ugly.
I have considered pinning the slope with soldier piles- either steel or wood.
My questions- Can I approach the design as a cantilevered wall using soil arching between piles? I am concerned because of long-term soil deformation.
Where should the base of my wall be considered to be? At the slide interface?