Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

piping failures

Status
Not open for further replies.

imok2

Mechanical
Oct 21, 2003
1,311
What are the types of failures encountered in Piping?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Axial splits from water freezing inside steel pipe.

Same, copper tube.

Transverse complete fracture of nylon vacuum tube from age and/or vibration.

Perforation of steel brake line by external corrosion.

Perforation of steel hydraulic component by internal localized corrosion from a single drop of water in silicone hydraulic fluid.

...

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
 
imok2:

Too many to list.

Here are some buzz words and acronyms to Google:

* HIC
* SOHIC
* SSCC
* temperature embrittlement
* chloride stress cracking
* nil ductility temperature
* erosion
* energy stored in compressed gas
* effects of prolonged exposure of steel to temperatures above 775 F
* creep damage
* cyclic loading and fatigue
* cathodic protection / galvanic corrosion
* effect of hydrogen sulphide on yellow metals
* piping flexibility and expansion

However, if one was to put a more academic spin on your question, you could probably categorize "types of failure encounterd in piping" this way:

* temperature related failures
* stress related failures
* chemical attack related failures
* electro-chemical related failures

or this way:

* failure due to bending
* failure due to hoop stress
* failure due to tension
* failure due to compressive stress / load (e.g. buckling)
* failure due to torsion
* failure due to shear
* failure due to impact
* failure due to excitation at natural frequency

The more I think about what might be a good answer, the more I think the question needs to be a bit more specific.


Regards,

SNORGY.
 
Yeah, but in field-gathering piping the number one cause of failure is someone hitting your line with heavy equipment. Number two is a distant second.

David
 
all the above, plus:

failure due to use of incompatible fittings (taper into parallel is a favourite)

failure due to incorrect assembly of the fittings.

A.
 
zdas04:

That is why Clients are adamant and willing to invest in the money it takes for the engineer to prepare accurate underground as-builts.

Ooops...sorry...that might have sounded bitter...

Regards,

SNORGY.
 
People who have not a clue about piping design designing piping systems!

 
I know a company where they hire electical experts for piping design.
It looks really weird at site there.
Controlvalves hanging 5 mtrs in the air, e-w and n-s 'pipebridges'(6"pipestands) at the same elevations
Hope it doesn't explode there.
 
SNORGY,
When the general public (bless their hearts) has access to rubber-tired-hoes or bull dozers and doesn't feel a need to check before they dig, perfect as-builts can be worthless. I had it so bad in one field that I developed an ArcVIEW script to allow me to click on any pipe segment and it would give me an automatic isolation list--I used it about once a quarter.

David
 
Thanks fellas your all good engineers because most of you were so specific in your answers I just wanted to see what kind of answers I would get On a piping test the answer is
Answer : 1. Catastrophic Failure 2. Fatigue Failure I guess that's about as general as you can get EH?
 
If that's all of the answers which are posted for the test - then the answers are wrong. I've seen plenty of cases where the piping failed to contain its fluid in a non-catastrophic manner - and fatigue was not even close to being involved. Clearly the test writer is not familiar with the term "leak before break."

jt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor