Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

PIPING TWO 100% PSV's IN PARALLEL

macabihaifa

Chemical
Nov 28, 2003
4
Hello,
when installing two 100% PSV's in parallel, one open and the second closed, what will be recommended
and good engineering practice from the mechanical point of view (reaction force in operation) and from
piping design as pressure drop (3% of set pressure in inlet piping):
to use 3-way valve between the 2 PSV's or each PSV with it's own valve (with an interlock) ?

regards and thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

This is not a 'parallel installation' as such. Parallel installation is where you have more than one Pressure-relief Valve relieving at the same time to pass the minimum required capacity caused by an overpressure event. What you have here is a redundancy set up, sometimes referred to as a stand-by or isolation valve set-up.

Can you clarify your question? Are you expecting, or have calculated an inlet pressure drop greater than 3%? Have you considered the pressure drop through a changeover type valve? This would also be in addition to any pressure drop in the upstream piping.

Depending on the design (and manufacturer), the pressure drop through a changeover valve can vary considerably. There are solutions but it depends on the size and application of the whole thing.

It might be worth your while to study the issue and various solutions in API 520 Part II - Section 8 - PRD Isolation (Stop) Valves.
 
Last edited:
3 way valves are no good from an isolation point of view - they are more like divertor valves.
Use full bore ball or gate valves in this application; pressure drop calcs to confirm pressure drop at rated flow should be done nevertheless.
 
As per ASME-1, isolation valves are used for power-actuated PRVs which are sized for not less than 10% of steaming capacity. However, no isolation valves were permitted between the main PRVs and the boiler.

Regarding reaction forces, for closed systems, the forces originate near the exit of PRV outlet vent pipe. For open systems, the forces on steam piping occur at or near the discharge elbow. The guidance on calculation for forces and moments is available in B31.1.
 
@goutam_freelance You are making incorrect statements (again, due to you referring to old editions of ASME) Per ASME I (2023) PG-71.3.1 you are allowed the use of changeover valves between boiler and pressure-relief valves provided certain conditions are met.

Since you also assumed the OP is discussing ASME I, for reference, changeover valves are allowed under ASME VIII (2023) Non Mandatory Appendix paragraph M-5, again provided certain conditions are met.

Regarding pressure-relief valve reaction forces, do you not think that reaction forces would act on the valves inlet and the piping leading to it?
 
You are making incorrect statements (again, due to you referring to old editions of ASME) Per ASME I (2023) PG-71.3.1 you are allowed the use of changeover valves between boiler and pressure-relief valves provided certain conditions are met.
I can not believe this as a problem in the change-over valve may lead to a catastrophic event.
Regarding pressure-relief valve reaction forces, do you not think that reaction forces would act on the valves inlet and the piping leading to it?
Yes. Dynamic forces at PSV elbow will be transferred to valve inlet piping.
 
That is why the code entry states "...under certain conditions". Maybe reading (having) the latest ASME Code editions will help.
 
good engineering practice from the mechanical point of view (reaction force in operation)

Do you mean these PSVs have open discharge nozzles? For info

good engineering practice from ... piping design as pressure drop (3% of set pressure in inlet piping):

The good eng practice is to install a PSV directly on the PV it protects.
Most reputable manufacturers have a dedicated design of changeover valves to minimize the hydraulic losses, e.g.
also note that changing the PSVs over can be realized with conventional fulbore valves equipped with a mech linkage (e.g. chain) or a mech programmable lock
 
Last edited:

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor