JA
Structural
- Jan 17, 2017
- 20
Hello,
I am analyzing a situation where a pitless adapter was installed directly on a threaded seam of a PVC well casing. Silt and other small debris was noticed fairly recently after the installation. Two years following the installation, the area around the well caved in at which point the well was dug to the pitless adapter. It was discovered at this time that the threaded joint that the pitless adapter was installed on had separated by approximately 2 inches. This allowed for soil to enter into the well.
Our initial impression is that the pitless adapter should not have been installed on the seam; however this does not seem to be a recommendation in the installation manual. Does anyone have any experience in this?
Further, by cutting the pitless adapter into the casing, they removed a portion of the threads holding the two sections of casing together. To be exact, 17% of the threads were removed around the circumference. I would understand that by doing this, the threads were not engaged how they were designed to and therefore allowed for the sections of casing to separate. Keep in mind we are in a cold climate with a frost line of about 6 to 8 feet. The pitless adapter was installed at 8' below surface.
I look forward to hearing your opinions. Thanks in advance.
I am analyzing a situation where a pitless adapter was installed directly on a threaded seam of a PVC well casing. Silt and other small debris was noticed fairly recently after the installation. Two years following the installation, the area around the well caved in at which point the well was dug to the pitless adapter. It was discovered at this time that the threaded joint that the pitless adapter was installed on had separated by approximately 2 inches. This allowed for soil to enter into the well.
Our initial impression is that the pitless adapter should not have been installed on the seam; however this does not seem to be a recommendation in the installation manual. Does anyone have any experience in this?
Further, by cutting the pitless adapter into the casing, they removed a portion of the threads holding the two sections of casing together. To be exact, 17% of the threads were removed around the circumference. I would understand that by doing this, the threads were not engaged how they were designed to and therefore allowed for the sections of casing to separate. Keep in mind we are in a cold climate with a frost line of about 6 to 8 feet. The pitless adapter was installed at 8' below surface.
I look forward to hearing your opinions. Thanks in advance.