Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Plastic counterpart for Stainless Steel

Status
Not open for further replies.

Suhrud Ghatpande

Mechanical
Jan 31, 2019
13
0
0
US
I'm working on replacing a steel door frame with a plastic one and looking for high stiffness plastic material which can sustain 50 lbs load without deflecting more than 5". I tried doing analysis on sides tubes of frame (80" long) using uPVC (extruded quality) and results were not so good. Nylon 6 30% glass filled did show better results but I'm looking for even better material, any suggestions?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Succesful plastic products typically have _much_ thicker and larger sections than equivalent metal products,
in order to compensate for the difference in flexural modulus, which is shrinking but still quite large.





Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
 
I did increase the thickness as much as I could but being door frame, not able to increase outside diameter, hence looking for better plastic materials to compensate for flexural modulus for slightly thicker and better cross section than SS.
 
The stiffest plastics typically comprise carbon fiber, which is expensive but slowly becoming less so, and any of several resins whose names I do not recall now, all of which are hideously expensive, only available in a few forms or very limited quantities, difficult to process, destructive to molding machines, or all of the above.

You have painted yourself into a corner, before you really got started.

I suggest you find another project.



Mike Halloran
Stratford, CT, USA
 
Pricing of any plastic replacement will likely exceed that of a simple light-gauge formed steel frame. Steel is cheap! What is your objective in seeking an alternate material?

It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.
 
Plastic is not a cheap material. Plastic components tend to be less cost than a metal counterpart usually because the processing of plastic is usually a one-step operation so the in-position cost is less.

The cheapest plastic is generally polypropylene. Here in the UK it's currently around the GBP 1200/metric tonne.



www.tynevalleyplastics.co.uk

Politicians like to panic, they need activity. It is their substitute for achievement.
 
@Pud With plastics i.e. with Nylon 6 same part is costing me $40 and with uPVC it is costing around $20 against $70 for SS . Nylon 6 30% GF brought me closer to the required strength but not up to the mark, other plastics with higher strength are costing nearly the same as SS or even more. So substantially increasing cross section with uPVC and getting the costing done is the option I'm left with unless I find any high strength cheaper material.
 
The mechanical properties of plastics are an order of magnitude lower than metals in terms of strength and stiffness. Composites combine the benefits of both at added cost for manufacturing. Adding a wire or strip of sheet metal can get the strength needed in a plastic part with little material cost added. In large volume, automated manufacturing this can be done at lower cost. But this is new technology and not readily available.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top