Other thing is that the AISC is the sole interpretation of the correct evaluation of the capacity in shear of the pipes. I think it is a smart evaluation because it acknowledges efficience to shear at midheight of the pipe section where the curve deviates less from the shear action, leaving free atop and bottom (by not counting the contribution to resist shear action of the pipe elements) to engage the tensile and compressive forces deriving from moment action.
So for a flexure setup looks quite adequate. For beamcolumn maybe the concurrence of compressive or tensile forces at the center of the section should be studied in interaction. Not looking any code, just thinking.