Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Positive displacement pump designs, efficiencies, small

Status
Not open for further replies.

fastline12

Aerospace
Jan 27, 2011
306
We are helping a friend with an air pump requirement and thought you guys might have some info from the automotive super charger area. Basically making a pump to test some proprietary components. pump MUST be compact, light weight, and positive displacement.

So far, all I am familiar with is twin screw and roots. Centrifugal is out because it is not pos disp. I think most roots type pumps are pretty heavy. We only need to move about 20-30ci/rev of air. As I understand it, a 6-71 blower is designed to provide 71ci of air to 6 cyl per rev??? Is that right?

This will have to be a custom design for fitment reasons so not really shopping for a ready made solution, but rather just the design types so we can hug a direction. I am not quite sure what efficiencies have been achieved but I seem to remember the twin screw has been able to hold decent eff over a decent range in the past. is that accurate?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Rots blowers are sometimes used to pump air for materials handling systems. Some for that application may suit.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376 for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
for site rules
 
That AMR a really cute!!! I might just have to see if I can find a few of those. I could not find any info to see if they are a straight lobe design or helical screw?

Also, on the rotary vane stuff, I wanted to ask about the elliptical housing designs with dual inlet/outlet. It would seem these might be a great design for high volume, low pressure to reduce pump speed requirements and reduce wear? Looking at some ballpark numbers, it looks like PR 2 could be easily obtained as well as nearly double the flow and reduced radial load on the rotor. Plumbing complexity would be substantially higher though.
 
Update - I was doing some simple number crunching on rotary vane and not finding them to be a very compact solution unless I have done something wrong. Simply using the swept volume x rpm x eff of 90% as a ballpark. Seems these pumps may be great for higher pressure at low rpm due to the good seal but might not be a good compact solution for high volume air.

Seems the movement of the vanes would LARGELY limit the rev ability of the pump so they could probably be made huge, swallow a large gulp real slow but doing it fast might really wear it out. hmmm.
 
AMR 300 has straight rotors, 2 lobes per rotor, PTFE coated. Used units typically fetch about $300 US. I did see someone in the US (on ebay) importing new units and selling for about $1000.

Engineering is the art of creating things you need, from things you can get.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor