P1ENG
Structural
- Aug 25, 2010
- 237
I've searched for my answer, but it seems past discussions never anchored down an opinion (pun intended).
I have clients always upset that I make them switch their hot-dipped galvanized, post-cast mechanical anchors for stainless steel when the anchor is located outdoors. I always reference the ICC ESR (regardless of anchor brand as they all have this similar verbiage) that use of zinc-coated carbon steel anchors are limited to dry, interior locations. They always claim that HDG is not the same as zinc plating, and I agree as plating is thin and doesn't offer the zinc/steel bonding that HDG provides. But the report doesn't say "plating". It says "zinc-coated". And regardless of the process, HDG is still coating the anchor in zinc, just thicker/better bonding. Some ESR's will even state "... stainless steel anchor is permitted for exterior exposure or damp environments." So, per the report, there are (2) options: zinc-coated or stainless. If they wanted to allow HDG anchors outdoors, then they would change the wording in the conditions of use to read "stainless steel and HDG anchors are permiteed for exterior exposure". Therefore, I always say they need stainless to be compliant. Normally, the client will (understandably) balk because of the price difference but ultimately will change the anchor since I'm sealing it. But I know I'm not making friends, so I'm doing my due-diligence to make sure HDG is meant to be included in the "zinc-coated" limit state. I'm hoping there is a more codified answer/explanation to this issue to remove my interpretation from upsetting the clients.
Juston Fluckey, SE, PE, AWS CWI
Engineering Consultant
I have clients always upset that I make them switch their hot-dipped galvanized, post-cast mechanical anchors for stainless steel when the anchor is located outdoors. I always reference the ICC ESR (regardless of anchor brand as they all have this similar verbiage) that use of zinc-coated carbon steel anchors are limited to dry, interior locations. They always claim that HDG is not the same as zinc plating, and I agree as plating is thin and doesn't offer the zinc/steel bonding that HDG provides. But the report doesn't say "plating". It says "zinc-coated". And regardless of the process, HDG is still coating the anchor in zinc, just thicker/better bonding. Some ESR's will even state "... stainless steel anchor is permitted for exterior exposure or damp environments." So, per the report, there are (2) options: zinc-coated or stainless. If they wanted to allow HDG anchors outdoors, then they would change the wording in the conditions of use to read "stainless steel and HDG anchors are permiteed for exterior exposure". Therefore, I always say they need stainless to be compliant. Normally, the client will (understandably) balk because of the price difference but ultimately will change the anchor since I'm sealing it. But I know I'm not making friends, so I'm doing my due-diligence to make sure HDG is meant to be included in the "zinc-coated" limit state. I'm hoping there is a more codified answer/explanation to this issue to remove my interpretation from upsetting the clients.
Juston Fluckey, SE, PE, AWS CWI
Engineering Consultant